E.
Chao, Jan.
2021, "The
Automated
Vehicles
Comprehensive
Plan
(Comprehensive
Plan)
describes how
the United
States
Department of
Transportation
(U.S. DOT) is
supporting the
safe
integration of
Automated
Driving
Systems (ADS)2
into the
surface
transportation
system. It
explains
Departmental
goals related
to ADS,
identifies
actions being
taken to meet
those goals,
and provides
real-world
examples of
how these
Departmental
actions relate
to emerging
ADS
applications...
" Read more
Hmmmm... I
guess this is
a good plan.
Of course,
Safety is #1,
as it should
be. DoT's #1
public
responsibility
is Safety.
Whether Cyber
Security and
Privacy are #
2 and 3 and
ahead of
Enhanced
Mobility and
Accessibility
is certainly
debatable.
And if the Enhanced
Mobility and
Accessibility
of the
"mobility
disadvantaged
that have been
left behind by
our current
favored
transport
system" were
to be a
category, then
that one
should be
right behind
Safety at #2
if not ahead
of Safety and
a solid #1.
The rest. as
they should,
are
appropriately
details. What
is most
disconcerting
about the
report are the
images. To me,
those images
depict the
current
"haves", not
"have-nots"
and thus don't
really address
the mobility
needs and
desires of
those whose
quality-of-life
could be most
enhanced by
automation
technology.
These images
seem to focus
the Plan on
giving those
that already
have pretty
good ways to
get around,
yet another
way to get
around, where,
when you
finally get
right down to
it, may at
best be only
slightly
better than
what they
already have.
This
Comprehensive
Plan should
first be
focused on
providing
high-quality
affordable
mobility to
those whose
quality-of-life
could be most
improved by
such new
technologies
and
subsequently
serve those
that already
enjoy and can
afford other
high-quality
forms of
mobility.
Also, Elaine, thank you for a
really good 4
years. You
(and USDoT)
were really
the star of
what was
otherwise a
most
embarrassing
Presidency.
Also, thanks
to Diana
Furchtgott-Roth
and many
others in US
DoT. Alain
[log in to unmask]" _mf_state="1" title="null" src="cid:[log in to unmask]" width="44" height="44" border="0"> The SmartDrivingCars eLetter, Pod-Casts, Zoom-Casts and Zoom-inars are made possible in part by support from the Smart Transportation and Technology ETF, symbol MOTO. For more information: www.motoetf.com. Most funding is supplied by Princeton University's Department of Operations Research & Financial Engineering and Princeton Autonomous Vehicle Engineering (PAVE) research laboratory as part of its research dissemination initiatives.
M.
Kimmelman, Jan
11, "The $1.6
billion
Moynihan Train
Hall opened at
dawn on New
Year’s morning
— on budget,
too, even a
couple of
months early.
Instagram
swooned.
Tweeters
channeled
Stefon from
“Saturday
Night Live.”
In the midst
of everything
else, we
needed this.
New York needs
this.
No, the huge,
lofty train
hall, with its
soaring
skylights,
doesn’t
magically
resurrect the
old
Pennsylvania
Station or
extinguish the
raging
dumpster fire
that is the
current one.
It leaves all
sorts of
herculean
challenges and
tasks around
Penn Station
unresolved.
But it
delivers on
its promise,
giving the
city the
uplifting
gateway it
deserves. When
was the last
time you could
say something
like that
about a public
works
project?...
Skeptics
had expressed
fears that the
new train hall
would be just
another
publicly
subsidized
shopping mall
masquerading
as a railway
station like
the $4 billion
Oculus at the
World Trade
Center. (I
can’t think of
a recent
project that
did more to
squander
public faith
or sour New
Yorkers on the
value of
architecture.)..."
Read
more
Hmmmm...Ouch!!!! I agree!!! Alain
BTS, Jan 8,
" This holiday
season, a
typical day
saw more
people staying
home.
As the charts
below show, on
average, a
greater
percentage of
Americans
stayed home
each day this
holiday season
(12/18/2020 -
1/3/2021) than
during the
previous year.
Similar to
Thanksgiving
travel,
Washington,
DC, and New
York State led
the nation in
the percentage
of people
staying home.
California
joined them as
the third area
with the
greatest
percentage of
people staying
home each day
on average
during the
holiday
period...." Read
more Hmmmm...Very interesting! Alain
Bloomberg,
Jan 14,
"President
Donald Trump’s
administration
is starting to
update federal
motor vehicle
safety
standards to
exempt
self-driving
cars from
crashworthiness
standards that
are applied to
cars operated
by humans, a
move
questioned by
safety
advocates.
The National
Highway
Traffic Safety
Administration
announced
Thursday it’s
beginning to
craft rules to
“clarify
ambiguities in
current
occupant
protection
standards for
vehicles
equipped with
automated
driving
systems that
are designed
without
traditional
manual driver
controls.”
The
rule-making
process would
be conducted
under the
administration
of
President-elect
Joe Biden, who
is to be
inaugurated
Jan. 20. But
consumer
safety
advocates say
new rules are
needed for
driverless
vehicles
instead of
exempting them
from existing
regulations...." Read
more Hmmmm... I tend to agree,
especially wrt
driverless
cars and
trucks. These
are
substantially
new
technologies
and deserve
their own
"modal"
administration,
rather being
an asterisk on
a conventional
mode. Alain
K. Pyle, Dec. 21, "It started with a phone call at the end of the 1975 Spring semester. Representative James J. Florio’s office was looking for expert help to evaluate a reorganization plan for the bankrupt railroads in the Northeast Corridor. In many ways, the eyes of the entire country were on this potential legislation and it involved the largest bankruptcy (PDF), Penn Central, in U.S. history......" Read more Hmmmm... We had a nice conversation. Thank you Ken. Alain
N.
Yekikian, Jan
11, "If you
aren't
familiar with
Chinese
automaker Nio,
there's a good
chance you're
not alone. The
Chinese brand
sprung up
seemingly
overnight, hit
a rough patch
in 2020, but
appears to be
back and
forging ahead
with new
models. Nio
already makes
three SUVs—the
ES8, EC6, and
ES6—and today
it took the
wraps off of
the ET7, their
first fully
autonomous
electric
vehicle....
To make the ET7 fully autonomous, Nio's own Autonomous Driving tech (or NAD for short) comes as an optional subscription service and is powered by 33 sensors in and around the car. The ET7 has 11 eight-megapixel cameras on board, one ultra long range LiDAR unit, five millimeter-wave radar cameras, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and two positioning units (V2X and ADMS). In total, the system can generate up to eight gigabytes of data per second. ... Read more Hmmmm... Sounds like Nio ET7 is brute force rather than elegant. I sure hope it has an "optimal forgetting algorithm" that throws away most of those data to determine the few pearls of wisdom that will keep it from crashing. My advice to the driver is... Don't stop paying close attention to the road ahead. As with many things, more is not necessarily better. Also, like many other things that sound too good to be true, they may well not be. We meed some real fact checking here. Sounds too Nikolaish to me Alain
A. Root,
Jan. 15,
"Steel
manufacturer
Worthington
Industries, an
early Nikola
investor,
finished
selling all
its Nikola
stock this
week. The
small-cap
company
realized more
than $600
million by
providing seed
capital to the
hydrogen-powered trucking start-up years ago.
Worthington
(ticker: WOR)
sold about 7
million Nikola
shares (NKLA)
for roughly
$147 million
on Jan. 13.
That works out
to a price of
about $21 a
share.
The
transaction
was the third
big Nikola
sale for
Worthington.
The company
sold stock
last August,
bringing in
$250 million.
And it had
earlier sold
stock in July,
bringing in
another $238
million.
Overall,
Worthington
sold its
Nikola stake
for an average
price of
around $34 a
share. The
$600-plus
million total
is
impressive—especially
for a company
with a market
capitalization
of roughly $3
billion. But
it doesn’t
answer the
question: Why
did
Worthington
invest in a
hydrogen-powered
trucking
start-up at
all? ... "
Read more
Hmmmm...Wow,
someone is
still willg to
pay
$21/share.
Alain
R. Mitchell, Jan 8, "New auto sales data shows a sharp divide between a surging market for luxury trucks and SUVs and soft sales for vehicles under $30,000..." Read more Hmmmm... What we may well find is that the pandemic really let the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Totally unfair! Alain
F. Lambert,
Jan 14., "...
Today, Tesla
released its
report for Q4
2020: In the
4th quarter,
we registered
one accident
for every 3.45
million miles
driven in
which drivers
had Autopilot
engaged. For
those driving
without
Autopilot but
with our
active safety
features, we
registered one
accident for
every 2.05
million miles
driven. For
those driving
without
Autopilot and
without our
active safety
features, we
registered one
accident for
every 1.27
million miles
driven. By
comparison,
NHTSA’s most
recent data
shows that in
the United
States there
is an
automobile
crash every
484,000 miles.
The best
comparison
point is
against the
same metric
over the same
period last
year to
account for
the weather
and seasonal
conditions:
Therefore,
it shows an
overall
improvement
with Autopilot
active, but
the data also
shows worse
performance
with the
safety
features
only...." Read
more Hmmmm... As is my custom every
time Tesla
releases this
information, I
offer to do,
pro bono, an
independent
analysis of
the underlying
data in an
effort to
"fact check"
Tesla's
claims. Alain
A. Hawkins,
Jan 12, "GM
says that two
new versions
of the Chevy
Bolt are set
to be unveiled
in February
2021. The
company has
released a new
teaser that
highlights a
new feature
coming to the
electric
vehicles: GM’s
well-regarded
advanced
driver assist
system, Super
Cruise.... "
Read
more Hmmmm...Let's see if this really
happens, if it
is an option
or standard
and, if an
option, how
much extra?
Let's hope
that GM
actually
builds and
Dealership
actually sell
Bolts with
SuperCruise.
Alain
F. Lambert,
Jan 13., "...
Now, one top
Wall Street
analyst,
Daniel Ives of
Wedbush, says
that it could
only be the
beginning of
Tesla’s stock
rise. In a
recent
interview with
TD Americas,
Ives said that
he sees Tesla
rising over
$1.5 trillion
over the next
year or two:
“In a year or
two from now,
we’re not just
looking at one
trillion for
Tesla, but in
a couple of
years this
could be a
company that
could start to
approach 1.5
trillion – 2
trillion
market
valuation.”
The analyst is
amongst the
most
optimistic on
Wall Street as
he sees Tesla
delivering
800,000
vehicles in
2021. Ives is
particularly
bullish on
Tesla’s
prospect in
China, where
he believes
Gigafactory
Shanghai to be
the “key to
the company’s
success.”
Furthermore,
the analyst
sees Joe Biden
winning the
election in
the US with
his green
agenda as a
positive for
Tesla. Here’s
the new
interview:..."
Read
more Hmmmm... Crazy!. Alain
J. Parsons,
Dec 30, "With
just two days
to spare
before a
year-end
implementation
deadline, 41
U.S. freight
and passenger
railroads have
met a federal
mandate for
full
deployment of
positive train
control to
prevent
potentially
deadly
crashes.
The Federal
Railroad
Administration
said on Dec.
29, that in
addition to
being in full
compliance
with the
safety
technology's
technical
requirements
on more than
57,500 route
miles, the
railroads have
achieved full
interoperability between host and tenant railroads operating on
PTC-governed
main lines.
The group
includes New
Jersey
Transit, which
the agency
said last
month appeared
at risk for
not meeting
the completion
target based
on earlier
data..." Read
more Hmmmm... Now that this has been
done, when
will railroads
begin to move
to "crewless"
operation.
That can't be
difficult
technologically.
Sociologically, a whole other question. Train crews need to be bought
out and
deserve to be
bought out.
Three (3) of
the Five (5)
man (they were
essentially
all men then)
crews were
bought out in
the 1970s. It
is time that
the railroads
buy out the
two remaining
crew members.
This would
allow them to
run many more
frequent short
trains rather
than a few
long trains.
The improved
service would
lead to more
business, more
short trains
and more
employees that
could be
represented by
the BLET. It
is not a
surprise that
State
legislators
are trending
in the
opposite
direction by mandating
2-person crews.
Alain
K. Korosec,
Jan. 11, "
Mobileye is
bringing its
autonomous
vehicle test
fleets to at
least four
more cities in
2021..." Read more Hmmmm...
See also: Mobileye
Take
Autonomous
Vehicle For a
test Spin In
Munich Traffic.
Unfortunately,
I still see
all of this as
simply "eye
candy" to sell
something that
actually has
no intention
of delivering
what it is
implying. I
still claim
that the
business case
is ZERO
(doesn't
exist) for
personally-owned
autonomous
vehicles.
(1. for it to
be purchased
by a consumer,
it must be
able to go on
most, if not
all roads.
We/MobilEye
are/is nowhere
close to being
able to
operate safely
on most roads,
let alone
"all" roads.
Thus, the
consumer
market has
zero
opportunity to
scale. (Heck
EVs can't
scale even
though their
range is at
least twice
what the
average daily
driving
range). If
MobilEye's
objective is
the fleet
market
operating
within a
certified
Operational
deign Domain,
then starting
in big cities,
New York City
being the
worse of the
worse,
As with Waymo, MobilEye should be testing in "Chandler" rather than "NYC". But if this is Click Bait and Clicks are the objective, then NYC is right-on. Alain
S. Herrera,
Jan 12, "The
longtime bus
driver has
slept in his
SUV for the
last two years
to save costs
and give
himself some
much-needed
rest.
“There’s tons
of people who
are commuting
because they
can’t afford
to live in the
Bay Area,”
said Glinton,
who has worked
for VTA for a
dozen years.
“On average, I
make $100,000
a year easy …
but who wants
to give
$30,000 a year
to someone
else for
rent?”..." Read
more Hmmmm... Not pretty! And it's
not just
transit
workers.
Apparently it
is also
Police, Fire
and other
civil
servants.
Affordable
housing also
needs to have
affordable
mobility; else
it in NOT
affordable
living! Alain
M. Sivak,
Jan. 12, "This
analysis
examines
distances
driven per
vehicle in
different
vehicle
classes in
2019 (the last
year before
the pandemic)
and compares
them with the
corresponding
values in
2009. ...
Noteworthy
trends are as
follows:..."
Read
more Hmmmm... Really strange "per
vehicle
stats" Given
the increase
in population
and the
economy over
the past 10
year period,
the number
of registered
vehicles must
have increased
"enormously";
else, this is
really strange
Alain
CES2021,
Jan 11, "It
took decades
for Machine
Learning and
Artificial
Intelligence
to enter the
mainstream.
Still, it is
new enough
that it
remains the
domain of data
scientists,
machine
learning, and
software
engineers. The
challenge is
that these
experts are in
short supply,
causing
projects to be
relatively
expensive with
relatively
long
timelines.
Blaize’s AI
Studio
promises (my bold) to
solve that by
allowing
subject matter
experts,
whether that
expert is a
city planner,
doctor, or
farmer, to
directly
create
artificial
intelligence
applications
that operate
locally. This
code-free,
visual and
open standards
tool allows
the subject
matter expert,
with minimal
help, to
prepare &
train, deploy
& manage,
and use &
monitor an
edge-based,
Artificial
Intelligent
app.... Read
more Hmmmm...
Promises,
promises...;
however, when
it claims "...
Working with
the doctor and
processing
approximately
12,000 images
the AI models
achieved 90%
accuracy
within two
days. This
greatly
exceeds the 76
to 80%
accuracy a
human would
achieve
examining
x-rays...." ... One must ask "how did it do
dat???" Who
was the "God"
that knew all
the correct
answers, such
that the AI
was able to
pat itself in
the back with
a score of 90%
and the human
that looked
over the whole
process only
got "76 to
80%". ... If
there is a
"God" that
always gets
the right
answer, then I
want the "God"
not this. If
there isn't a
"God" with all
the right
answers, and
the right
answers come
from the
human, then
these reported
results are
simply "the
luck" of this
test, rather
than the
long-run
statistical
performance of
this
approach.
This is really
half-baked.
Alain
These
editions are
sponsored by
the SmartETFs
Smart
Transportation
and Technology
ETF, symbol
MOTO. For more
information
head to www.motoetf.com
F. Fishkin,
Nov 25, "What
you should
know about
electric cars,
climate change
and more. The
Dispatcher
publisher
Michael Sena
joins
Princeton's
Alain
Kornhauser and
co-host Fred
Fishkin in an
eye opening
edition of
Smart Driving
Cars.."
F. Fishkin, Nov 24, "When it comes to active driver assistance systems, what works and what needs improvement? Some answers from Kelly Funkhouser… program manager for vehicle interface, head of connected and automated vehicles at Consumer Reports. She joins Princeton's Alain Kornhauser and co-host Fred Fishkin for episode 186 of Smart Driving Cars."
F. Fishkin,
Aug 20, "Tesla
grows while
other
automakers
flounder. And
creating
standards in
an era of
mistrust. The
Dispatcher
publisher
joins
Princeton's
Alain
Kornhauser and
co-host Fred
Fishkin in a
thought
provoking
episode.
Plus...transportation
planning
during and
after the
pandemic...NVIDIA...and
more."
F. Fishkin Aug 13, "Ghost Road.. Beyond the Driverless Car author Anthony Townsend brings a unique viewpoint to the debate on the future of mobility...and the impact of the pandemic on ride sharing. Townsend joins Princeton's Alain Kornhauser and co-host Fred Fishkin for that and the latest developments from Uber, Lyft, Tesla and more."
F. Fishkin
Aug 8, "Is
Tesla a tech
stock? Or a
fashion
product? Maniv
Mobility's
Olaf Sakkers
authored a
piece on
Medium with
that title and
he joins
Princeton's
Alain
Kornhauser
& co-host
Fred Fishkin
for that
plus... GM's
would be Tesla
challenger
Cadillac
Lyriq,
TuSimple,
Uber, Ford and
more."
F. Fishkin
July 29, "In
the midst of a
pandemic, what
is the future
of ride
sharing and
mobility?
Princeton's
Alain
Kornhauser and
co-host Fred
Fishkin are
joined by
Robin Chase
and Carlos
Pardo of the
New Urban
Mobility
Alliance and
the director
of the
Institute for
Transportation
Studies at U C
Davis, Daniel
Sperling to
dig into the
challenges
ahead."
F. Fishkin, July 20, "Is Driverless home delivery the fastest route to Affordable Mobility for the Mobility Disadvantaged? ... "
F. Fishkin, July 2, "Transportation, racial injustices and changing the thinking around the future of mobility. NYU McSilver Institute for Poverty Policy & Research fellow Henry Greenidge joins Princeton's Alain Kornhauser and co-host Fred Fishkin in an eye and mind opening episode of Smart Driving Cars. Plus Amazon, Zoox, Waymo, Tesla & more. ." ... Alain
F. Fishkin,
June 2, "But
the debate is
not really
about
technology nor
is it about
who delivers
the best value
for the money
or the most
privacy. It is
about ..."
C.
Isidore, Dec
17, "Automatic
braking, once
a feature
available
exclusively to
high-end cars,
is becoming
common across
the industry,
according to
analysis from
Consumer
Reports and
the Insurance
Institute for
Highway
Safety.
But the
industry has
some notable
exceptions,
including
General Motors
(GM) and Fiat
Chrysler
(FCAU), which
badly trail
rivals in
offering
automatic
braking as
standard
equipment,
according to
the safety
groups.
Automatic
braking uses
sensors to
apply brakes
when a vehicle
ahead is
stopped, and
the car's
onboard
computer can
avoid or
lessen the
impact of an
accident. It's
an
increasingly
popular
feature with
car buyers.
Many
automakers are
emphasizing
the feature in
their
advertising
and sales
pitches.
Four
higher-end
brands already
had the
feature on 99%
or better of
their vehicles
before this
past year:
Audi,
Mercedes-Benz,
Volvo and
Tesla (TSLA).
Six more have
the feature on
at least 96%
of the
vehicles they
sold in the
United States
between
September 2019
and September
2020: BMW,
Hyundai,
Mazda, Subaru,
Toyota (TM)
and Volkswagen
(VLKAF). Three
more
automakers —
Ford (F),
Honda (HMC)
and Nissan
(NSANF), had
automatic
braking on
more than 90%
of their US
vehicles....
" Read
more Hmmmm... Set up for the 3rd
session of the
SDC Summit.
Alain
D. Shapiro,
Dec. 17, "When
it comes to
future
mobility, you
may not have
to pave as
many paradises
for personal
car parking
lots.
This week,
autonomous
mobility
company Zoox
unveiled its
much-anticipated
purpose-built
robotaxi.
Designed for
everyday urban
mobility, the
vehicle is
powered by
NVIDIA and is
one of the
first level 5
robotaxis
featuring
bi-directional
capabilities,
providing a
concrete view
into the next
generation of
intelligent
transportation...."
Read
more Hmmmm... Watch Zoom-Cast 192.
Alain
C. Metz
& K.
Conger, Dec 7,
"Uber, which
spent hundreds
of millions of
dollars on a
self-driving
car project
that
executives
once believed
was a key to
becoming
profitable, is
handing the
autonomous
vehicle effort
over to a
Silicon Valley
start-up, the
companies said
on Monday.
Uber will also
invest $400
million in the
start-up,
called Aurora,
so it is
essentially
paying the
company to
take over the
autonomous car
operation,
which had
become a
financial and
legal
headache. Uber
is likely to
license
whatever
technology
Aurora manages
to create.
The deal
amounts to a
fire-sale end
to a
high-profile
but
star-crossed
effort to
replace Uber’s
human drivers
with machines
that could
drive on their
own. It is
also
indicative of
the challenges
facing other
autonomous
vehicle
projects,
which have
received
billions in
investments
from Silicon
Valley and
automakers but
have not
produced the
fleets of
robotic
vehicles some
thought would
be on the
streets by
now...." Read
more Hmmmm... Actually a good
article.
Alain
S. Wilmot,
Nov 30,
"Nikola Corp.
NKLA 0.76%
isn't turning
out to be the
next Tesla
that investors
and were
hoping for.
The
electric-vehicle
startup put
its
eye-catching
“Badgerâ€
pickup-truck
project on ice
Monday as part
of a radically
shrunken
version of its
deal with GM.
All that is
left of the
original
agreement
signed in
September is a
plan for GM to
supply Nikola
with fuel-cell
technology for
U.S. big rigs.
Detroit's
biggest auto
maker had
planned to
take an equity
stake in
Nikola in
exchange for
building the
Badger under
contract. But
the deal has
been in doubt
almost from
the start
after a
hedge-fund
report
detailed the
limitations of
Nikola's
technology,
leading to the
resignation of
founder Trevor
Milton.
GM won't sell
Nikola fuel
cells soon.
For all its
fanfare about
hydrogen, the
startup is
currently
focused on
battery-powered
versions of
its first
electric
truck, theTre,
It hopes to
start
full-scale
production in
the fourth
quarter of
next year in
Germany and in
early 2022 in
Coolidge,
Ariz. Hydrogen
trucks won't
come before
2023, and in
Europe Nikola
is using Bosch
as its
fuel-cell
supplier.
..." Read
more Hmmmm... Lessons for many in this
endeavor. See
also Andrew
Hawkin's take
as well as David
Morris'.
Alain
Support the creation of government policies and company practices to ensure that innovation and safety go hand-in-handIn October 2020, Consumer Reports published ratings of Active Driving Assistance Systems, defined as systems that allow the driver to use Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and Lane Keeping Assistance (LKA) to simultaneously control both the speed and steering of the vehicle. An industry webinar was also held...." Read more Hmmmm.... A MUST read along with "Cadillac's Super Cruise Outperforms Other Driving Assistance Systems". Most unfortunately, CR has not picked up on my main complaint about ACC: Tapping of the brakes by the driver turns off the ACC! This is BAD!!! Even the hardest, let alone the slightest, engagement of the brakes should NOTturn off the ACC. It should ONLYdisengage the acceleration/throttle function of the ACC!
Use consumer data to inform the industry of best-practices to aid in development
Advocate for transparency and clarity in marketing and consumer education of systems
K. Pyle,
Nov 12, "A key
recommendation
from the 2017
pilot was to
explore
whether paying
at the pump
could work for
a road charge
just like it
does for the
gas tax. How
could the user
experience be
as easy as
possible? With
support from a
federal
Surface
Transportation
Funding
Alternative
grant,
California
will test how
road charge
can work with
four
technologies:
usage-based
insurance,
ridesharing,
electric
vehicle
charging
stations/pay-at-the-pump
systems, and
autonomous
vehicles.
Interested in
participating?
The
demonstration
will begin in
January 2021
and run for
six months.
Complete the Contact Us data
form to
express your
interest in
volunteering
for one or
more
demonstration
phases.... " Read
moreHmmmm... New Jersey is seeking
volunteers for
its version of
this. Participation is easy. You will
enroll via a
quick, online
enrollment
process, plug
a mileage
reporting
device into
your vehicle
and drive.
During the
pilot, you
will receive
monthly
simulated
statements
that compare
what you pay
in current
state fuel
taxes to what
you could pay
in an MBUF
system. It is
okay if you
are not
driving as
much as you
typically
would because
of the
COVID-19
Pandemic.
Your driving
data and
feedback
provided
through
anonymous
online surveys
will help us
understand key
issues such as
privacy,
equity and
administrative
costs with an
MBUF
system.
Please contact [log in to unmask] to participate and help n the New Jersey version. Use Subject: Please send, Body:Mileage-Base User Fee (MBUF) Demonstration registration information . We need volunteers. Thank you for helping. Alain
W.
Kaufman, Nov.
4, "Tesla
recently made
headlines with
the beta
launch of its
Full
Self-Driving
system. That
system comes
with a
disclaimer
saying,
“It
may do the
wrong thing at
the worst
time, so you
must always
keep your
hands on the
wheel and pay
extra
attention to
the
road.â€ÂÂ
Tesla's system
has impressive
capabilities,
but it's
definitely not
hands-free
driving. A few
years ago,
news stories
seemed to say
that
autonomous
vehicles were
just a few
years away.
Well, it's
been a few
years and
autonomous
vehicles are,
alas, still in
the future.
Right now,
there is no
car on sale
that can drive
itself without
requiring the
driver to pay
attention to
the road and
be prepared to
take control
of the
vehicle. In
fact, some
automakers
have slowed
down their
timelines.
Here are three
reasons why
you can't buy
a self-driving
car today and
one place
you're likely
to find them
first....
Waymo Team, Oct. 30, "On October 8th, Waymo opened its fully autonomous ride-hailing service to the general public in Phoenix. Right now members of the public are hailing vehicles with no human driver controlling the car – either in the vehicle or remotely – to help them get to where they're going as part of their everyday lives...." Read more Hmmmm...
N, Webb,
Oct. 30, "As
the world's
most
experienced
developer of
automated
driving
systems, Waymo
has extensive
experience in
developing and
applying
state-of-the-art
safety
methodologies.
Waymo's
methodologies
help implement
Waymo's
forward-looking safety philosophy: Waymo will reduce traffic injuries
and fatalities
by driving
safely and
responsibly,
and will
carefully
manage risk as
we scale our
operations.
Waymo's safety
methodologies,
which draw on
well
established
engineering
processes and
address new
safety
challenges
specific to
Automated
Vehicle
technology,
provide a firm
foundation for
safe
deployment of
our Level 4
ADS, which we
also refer to
as the Waymo
Driver.
Waymo's
determination
of its
readiness to
deploy its AVs
safely in
different
settings rests
on that firm
foundation and
on a thorough
analysis of
risks specific
to a
particular
Operational
Design Domain
)...." Read
more Hmmmm... The process. Must
read! Alain
M. Schwall, Oct. 30, "Waymo's mission to reduce traffic injuries and fatalities and improve mobility for all has led us to expand deployment of automated vehicles (AVs) on public roads without a human driver behind the wheel. As part of this process, Waymo is committed to providing the public with informative and relevant data regarding the demonstrated safety of Waymo's automated driving system (ADS), which we call the Waymo Driver...." Read more Hmmmm... The substance. Must read! ...
I had the priveledge of reviewing Waymo's most recent
Safety
Reports 1 , 2 (above)
In the past, safety reports by the AV community have
largely been a
response to
NHTSA'¢s Voluntary
Safety
Self-Assessments and
have, in my
opinion, been
largely public
relations
documents.
While
generally
descriptive
about the
testing
processes they
contain very
little, if
any,
substantive
information
about their safety
related experience
to-date
focused
exclusively on
driverless
operation.
Safe driverless operation is absolutely necessary for
AVs to evolve
from extremely
expensive
chauffeured
rides to
affordable
mobility
available to
essentially
anyone
throughout an
Operational
Design Domain
(ODD).
Affordability
requires that
the mobility
be delivered
without a
driver or
attendant
on-board the
vehicle. Only
passengers.
The decision to remove the driver/attendant rests in
part on the
shoulders of
public safety
regulators who
need to allow
such
operation, but
more
importantly,
on the
shoulders of
the real
decision
makers at the
AV company.
In the end, it
is those AV
company
decision
makers who
will be held
fully
responsible
for any lapse
in the safety
of the
driverless
operation.
These decision
makers are
inside the AV
companies and
are, of
course, privy
to all the
details and
substance
about their
own safety
related
driverless
operation,
which, in the
past, has not
been shared in
their
Voluntary
Safety
Self-assessments.
My impression is that these just released Waymo Safety
Reports
contain the
substantive
information
that clearly
depicts
Waymo's
safety-related
driverless
operational
experience.
To me, they
read like
internal
documents
meant to guide
and inform
internal
decision
makers to
objectively
decide if a
sufficiently
safe
operational
experience has
been achieved
in order to
vote to fully
accept the
safety
responsibility
of driverless
operation in
their
Operational
Design
Domain.
Given the information that is contained in these
documents, it
does not
surprise me
that Waymo
decision
makers have
decided to
proceed with
driverless
operation in
the Phoenix
Operational
Design Domain.
Had I had the
responsibility
of being one
of the
decision
makers
reviewing
these
documents, I
would have
also voted
yes.
Alain
J. Davis,
Oct 20,
"Launching a
self-driving
service is
complex. Many
different
pieces need to
come together
to create a
trusted and
scalable
self-driving
service that
provides value
to customers
and the cities
they operate
in. At Ford,
we are taking
a thoughtful
approach to
how we bring
together all
these pieces
to help shape
the future of
self-driving
vehicles. One
important part
of this
service is the
vehicle, which
will allow us
to stand up
our
self-driving
business.
Meet the
Fourth
Generation
Self-Driving
Test Vehicle:
Beginning to
roll out this
month, Ford
and Argo's
fourth-generation self-driving test vehicles are built on the Escape
Hybrid
platform and
feature the
latest
advancements
in sensing and
computing
technology.
The Escape
Hybrid is also
the
architecture
and platform
we have chosen
to use to
bring our
autonomous
vehicle
service
online....." Read more Hmmmm.... See
video.
Imprssive.
Listen/watch
SmartDrivingCars PodCast / ZoomCast with John Rich. CNBC's
take as
well as THe
Detroit News.
Alain
J.
Szczesny, Oct
7, "Ford Motor
Co's push to
broaden its
self-driving
vehicle
technology
portfolio, led
to it taking a
stake in a
Silicon Valley
company
developing
lidar systems
needed to help
guide
autonomous
vehicles.
The automaker
revealed it
owns a 7.6%
stake, or
13.06 million
shares, in
Velodyne
Lidar,
according to a
report filed
with the
Securities
Exchange
Commission.
With the
shares trading
at $17.40 per
share, the
stake is worth
approximately
$227.2
million. Ford
filed the
report to
remain
compliant with
the SEC...." Read more Hmmmm.... Interesting, but even
more
interesting is
the
SmartDrivingCarsPodCast / ZoomCast with John Rich. Alain
Staff,
Oct. 2020 "On
this page you
will find the
gradings of
cars tested by
Euro NCAP on
automated
driving
technologies.
For its 2020
assessment of
Highway Assist
systems, Euro
NCAP has
developed
dedicated test
and assessment
protocols,
divided into
two main
areas:
Assistance
Competence,
based on the
balance
between Driver
Engagement and
Vehicle
Assistance,
and Safety
Backup...." Read
more Hmmmm....Look carefully at each
component of
the rating
system. NCAP
has chosen one
algorithmic
way of "adding
apples and
oranges" to
get their
rating.
Unfortunately
they don't
divulge the
secret
formula. To
me, it doesn't
seem to be
sufficiently
iweighted on
what I
consider to be
the most
important
element...
"Collision
Avoidance".
If the system
doesn't do
that well,
then why
bother being
good at
Consumer
Information
(unless that
information
says clearly
that the
system doesn't
work well".
If NCAP itself did a good job of
Consumer
Information
then it would
divulge its
algorithm and
allow the
consumer to
edit its
weights to
trade-off what
the consumer
believes is
more or less
important.
A. Kornhauser, Jan 12, Hmmmm... Self-driving cars are hot and the OEMs are responding. I'm about to buy a new Subaru Outback and EyeSight is standard. It is no longer just AutoPilot or expensive options that car salesmen don't sell. Car companies, as reflected in what is in showrooms and what was promoted at CES, have realized the comfort and convenience of Self-driving technology (cars that have a lot of the Safe-driving car features but also enable you to take your feet off the pedals and hands off the wheel at least for short periods of time. These technologies are really becoming the 'chrome and fins' that sell cars to individuals in the 2020s. The momentum is all behind that happening and there is little Washington or Trenton or Princeton Council can do about it. Hopefully part of that momentum will be to make these systems actually work well, especially the Automated Emergency Braking Systems (MUST quit assuming that all stationary objects in the lane ahead can be passed under and consequently each is disregarded. As Tesla is finding out, sometimes those objects are parked firetrucks.) and begin to put hard limits on over-speeding, tailgating and use while driver is impaired. Self-driving cars are unfortunately going to lead to substantial urban sprawl, increased VMT, increased congestion and do nothing to help the energy and pollution challenges of our addiction to the personal automobile. Only 'Waymo-style Driverless' (autonomousTaxis, (aTaxis)) tuned to entice ride-sharing can potentially stem the tide of ever more personal car ownership and ever expanding urban sprawl. Alain
A. Kornhauser, Jan. 6, Hmmmm... I'm in rehab and hope to go home on Wednesday morning. Thank you to so many of you for all the good wishes and prayers. They each helped. I'm looking to making a full recovery. Remember, if you don't feel well, get evaluated by a doctor. I was totally clueless about what hit me from out of nowhere. Alain
Oct 16, Establishes
fully
autonomous
vehicle pilot
program A4573 Sponsors:
Zwicker (D16);
Benson (D14)
Oct 16, Establishes New
Jersey
Advanced
Autonomous
Vehicle Task
Force AJR164Sponsors:
Benson (D14);
Zwicker (D16);
Lampitt (D6)
May
24, "About
9:58 p.m., on
Sunday, March
18, 2018, an
Uber
Technologies,
Inc. test
vehicle, based
on a modified
2017 Volvo
XC90 and
operating with
a self-driving
system in
computer
control mode,
struck a
pedestrian on
northbound
Mill Avenue,
in Tempe,
Maricopa
County,
Arizona.
...The
vehicle was
factory
equipped with
several
advanced
driver
assistance
functions by
Volvo Cars,
the original
manufacturer.
The systems
included a
collision
avoidance
function with
automatic
emergency
braking, known
as City
Safety, as
well as
functions for
detecting
driver
alertness and
road sign
information.
All these
Volvo
functions are
disabled when
the test
vehicle is
operated in
computer
control..." Read
more Hmmmm.... Uber must believe
that its
systems are
better at
avoiding
Collisions and
Automated
Emergency
Braking than
Volvo's. At least this gets Volvo
"off the
hook".
"...According to data obtained from the self-driving
system, the
system first
registered
radar and
LIDAR
observations
of the
pedestrian
about 6
seconds before
impact, when
the vehicle
was traveling
at 43 mph..." (=
63
feet/second)
So the system
started
"seeing an
obstacle when
it was 63 x 6
= 378 feet
away... more
than a
football
field,
including end
zones!
"...As the vehicle
and pedestrian
paths
converged, the
self-driving
system
software
classified the
pedestrian as
an unknown
object, as a
vehicle, and
then as a
bicycle with
varying
expectations
of future
travel
path..." (NTSB: Please tell us
precisely when
it classified
this "object'
as a vehicle and
be explicit
about the
expected "future
travel
paths." Forget the path, please just tell us the precise
velocity
vector that
Uber's system
attached to
the "object",
then the
"vehicle".
Why didn't the
the Uber
system
instruct the
Volvo to begin
to slow down
(or speed up)
to avoid a
collision? If
these paths
(or velocity
vectors) were
not accurate,
then why
weren't they
accurate? Why
was the object
classified as
a
"Vehicle" ?? When did it finally classify the object as a "bicycle"? Why did
it change
classifications?
How often was
the
classification
of this object
done. Please
divulge the
time and the
outcome of
each
classification
of this
object.
In the tests
that Uber has
done, how
often has the
system
mis-classified
an object as a"pedestrian"when the object was
actually an
overpass, or
an overhead
sign or
overhead
branches/leaves
that the car
could safely
pass under, or
was nothing at
all??
(Basically,
what are the
false alarm
characteristics
of Uber's
Self-driving
sensor/software
system as a
function of
vehicle speed
and
time-of-day?)
"...At 1.3 seconds before impact, (impact speed was 39mph = 57.2 ft/sec) the self-driving system determined that an emergency braking maneuver was needed to mitigate a collision" (1.3 x 57.2 = 74.4 ft. which is about equal to the braking distance. So it still could have stopped short.
"...According to Uber, emergency braking maneuvers are not
enabled while
the vehicle is
under computer
control, to
reduce (eradicate??) the potential for erratic
vehicle
behavior.
..." NTSB: Please describe/define potential and erratic vehicle behavior Also
please uncover
and divulge
the design
& decision
process that
Uber went
through to
decide that
this risk
(disabling the
AEB) was worth
the reward of
eradicating " "erratic vehicle behavior". This is fundamentally BAD design. If the Uber
system's false
alarm rate is
so large that
the best way
to deal with
false alarms
is to turn off
the AEB, then
the system
should never
have been
permitted on
public
roadways.
"...The vehicle operator is
relied on to
intervene and
take action. " Wow!
If Uber's
system
fundamentally
relies on a
human to
intervene,
then Uber is
nowhere near
creating a
Driverless
vehicle.
Without its
own Driverless
vehicle Uber
is past "Peak
valuation".
Video similar to part of Adam's Luncheon talk @ 2015 Florida Automated Vehicle Symposium on Dec 1. Hmmm ... Watch Video especially at the 13:12 mark. Compelling; especially after the 60 Minutes segment above! Also see his TipRanks. Alain
This list is maintained by Alain Kornhauserand hosted by
the Princeton
University
Leave |Re-enter
229 Sherrerd Hall Princeton University Princeton, NJ [log in to unmask] 609-258-4657 (o) 609-980-1427 (c) |
[log in to unmask]" id="[log in to unmask]" _mf_state="1" title="null" style="float: right; padding-left: 2em;" data-unique-identifier="" width="90" height="100" border="0"> |
229 Sherrerd Hall Princeton University Princeton, NJ [log in to unmask] 609-258-4657 (o) 609-980-1427 (c) |
[log in to unmask]" class="" width="90" height="100" border="0"> |