2015-11-27

2015-11-27

November 26, 2015

Inside Faraday Future, the secretive car company chasing Tesla

      T. Warren Nov. 19 "...This is the headquarters of Faraday
      Future, a young, seemingly well-funded company with an odd
      name that hasn't said much about what it's working on. We know
      that electric cars are involved, and we know that they're
      probably years away from production. In the year and a half
      since Faraday's founding, it has transformed this facility
      into a bustling corporate campus, stacked with a who's-who
      list of poaches from some of California's most prominent tech
      companies..

      Faraday's cars will be electric, and Sampson suggested that
      they will be autonomous. More pointedly, he focused on the
      potential for new ownership models that Faraday is
      considering. "Uber, for instance, is a new way of traveling, a
      new way of getting about. Some people are considering not even
      having a car. The cars of the future have got to meet those
      needs," he says. Sampson imagines various custom vehicles that
      are designed for specific purposes such as a family trip, the
      work commute, or Home Depot runs. "I don't have to buy one
      compromise vehicle, I can just have use of the perfect model
      when I need it, like a subscription service. We now subscribe
      to music; we used to buy music."..." [Read mor](http://www.theverge.com/2015/11/19/9761852/faraday-future-car-company-interview-tour-electric-tesla-competitor)e  Hmm... Very interesting,
          especially the video interview.  Faraday may be real and
          have legs.  See also [Green Car Congress](http://www.greencarcongress.com/2015/11/20151105-ff.html) and [StreetInsider.com](http://www.streetinsider.com/Management+Changes/Senior+Autopilot+Engineer+Said+to+Depart+Tesla+%28TSLA%29+for+Startup+%28MBLY%29/11104730.html)
          Alain

US officials signal move toward embracing self-driving cars

J. Prichard, Nov. 24 “Federal transportation officials are rethinking their position on self-driving cars with an eye toward getting the emerging technology into the public’s hands…With the technology’s rapid development, that federal policy is being updated, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said Tuesday.

            "I want the posture of our agency to be obviously
            vigilant on the safety front, but I don't want our
            agency to be skittish about innovations that are out
            there," Foxx said..." [Read mo](http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SELF_DRIVING_CARS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-11-24-18-34-52)[re](http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SELF_DRIVING_CARS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-11-24-18-34-52) Hmmm... Although there isn't
                much more, could it be that US DoT will finally
                realize that automation is the appropriate way
                address their primary mission which is
                safety and to do it not only with cars, but with
                trucks and buses too.  While they are at it, they
                should also take some interest in
                retrofit/aftermarket opportunities if they expect to
                reap substantial safety benefits earlier rather than
                later.  Also, shouldn't all of this be contained in
                the emergent re-authorization legislation????  Alain

Technology that could curb truck deaths is mired in DC bureaucracy

      J. Edwards, Nov 24, "...earlier this month, the powerful House
      Rules Committee refused to consider an amendment to a $325
      billion transportation policy bill. The measure proposed by
      Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Lithonia, would have required the
      technology on commercial motor vehicles after three
      years...."The rules committee decided in its abundant wisdom
      that it was not in order," Johnson said. "They don't have to
      give a reason."...Rep. Johnson said the months of carnage on
      the expressway between Macon and Savannah prompted him to
      question why tractor-trailers shouldn't have the same
      technology already in cars...."Nothing moves quickly in
      Washington,...(except to preserve the
          legacy of "connected cars" and "truck platoons")[Read more](http://www.myajc.com/news/news/transportation/technology-that-could-curb-truck-deaths-is-mired-i/npRNN/)Hmmm... Right on!
          Even though many of the comments deserve to be in C'Mon
          Man!  See Bendix [video1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv9UyI2gjlI)
          and [video2](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtvLVYrsdZI).
          Alain

City Planning Needed as 6 out of 10 Global Consumers Expect Driverless Revolution

      P. Vanham, Nov 24 "The age of autonomous vehicles is fast
      approaching, and city leaders need to take steps to prepare as
      the disruptive technology becomes a reality, according to[new survey result](http://orfe.princeton.edu/%7Ealaink/SmartDrivingCars/PDFs/WEF_Self-DrivingVehiclesInAnUrbanContext.pdf)s by the [World Economic Forum](http://www.weforum.org/)released

      today...As part of a project the World Economic Forum also
      conducted interviews with over 20 city policy-makers and
      transport authorities from cities such as Dubai, Helsinki, New
      York, Amsterdam, Singapore and Toronto about their
      expectations for SDVs. The survey showed that most city
      authorities believe that applications like shared self-driving
      vehicles are coming very quickly and will have the potential
      to be the last-mile solution for public transport.

      Nevertheless, most cities have yet to integrate SDV technology
      into their future mobility plans. "Many cities aren't yet
      seeing how the programmes of today, such as car sharing and
      smart parking, might provide an essential backbone for shared
      self-driving vehicle programmes in the future," said Alex
      Mitchell, Head of the Automotive Industry at the World
      Economic Forum...."  [Read more](https://agenda.weforum.org/news/city-planning-needed-as-6-out-of-10-global-consumers-expect-driverless-revolution/)  Hmmmm.... Let alone,
          autonomousTaxis (aTaxis) revolutionizing shared-ride mass
          transit. Be sure to look at the [WEF Briefing on Self-Driving Vehicles](http://orfe.princeton.edu/%7Ealaink/SmartDrivingCars/PDFs/WEF_Self-DrivingVehiclesInAnUrbanContext.pdf) (The "10 insights
          that surprised us" are very interesting; especially #6
          (sharing aTaxi rides), for which the door is certainly
          left open as one would expect that sharing a ride would be
          done in conjunction with a high discount.  Money is
          on the table). Alain

Interview: How Autonomous Vehicles will Transform Fuel Consumption

      L. Hayward, Nov 25 "In an exclusive interview, Brad Templeton
      of Singularity University discusses the many ways that an
      autonomous vehicles will transform our lives, and the ways we
      consume energy. Templeton offers specific examples of how the
      sharing economy will enable greater efficiency and convenience
      in personal transportation"[Watch Video](http://energyfuse.org/videos/interview-how-autonomous-vehicles-will-transform-fuel-consumption/) Hmmm...Well
                worth watching. Alain

What happens when cities and states try to prepare for self-driving cars

      M. McFarland, Nov 25 ""A technology tsunami." That's
      how Richard Biter, assistant secretary of the Florida
      Department of Transportation, describes the arrival of
      autonomous vehicles."We're designing infrastructure today with
      life expectancies of 50, 80, even 100 years into the future,"
      Biter said. "Not just Florida but virtually every state needs
      to start taking into account what are the factors that we need
      to be aware of and what can we do in designing and building
      our infrastructure today that will be able to take full
      advantage of this technology." ..."[Read more](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2015/11/25/what-happens-when-cities-and-states-try-to-prepare-for-self-driving-cars/)Hmmm... Yup! Alain

Euro NCAP Puts Autonomous Pedestrian Detection to the Test

      Press Release, Nov 10 "European safety organisation Euro NCAP
      is introducing a new test that will check how well vehicles
      autonomously detect and prevent collisions with pedestrians.
      With new vehicles offering more autonomous driver assist
      systems, Euro NCAP's Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB)
      Pedestrian tests will make it simpler for consumers and
      manufacturers to find out which systems work best. ...[Read more](http://www.euroncap.com/en/press-media/press-releases/euro-ncap-puts-autonomous-pedestrian-detection-to-the-test/)  Hmmm... [Please see their video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLU9zdsud17Y1DYndFClb3WYVzsPBNI3Hv&v=FTKxCE5qmQM)Alain

How We Roll: Is America Ready for a Driverless Future?

G. Cherry, Nov 6 “…We’re

      fascinated by driverless vehicles – at least in theory. The
      most popular videos of Google's driverless cars have scored
      tens of millions of views on YouTube. New studies and articles
      come out literally every day. And according to a recent
      University of Michigan study, a solid majority of Americans
      have at least some interest in owning or using a driverless
      car."..."

          ...If a car company says 'We're so confident in our system
          that we'll assume the liability for a crash,' that's a
          pretty powerful statement," he says. "You've just solved
          the liability problem, you've put your money where your
          mouth is when it comes to safety and you've also laid out
          an attractive marketing proposition. That kind of thing
          could really change the game when it comes to consumer
          acceptance." [Read more](http://dme.engin.umich.edu/driverlesscars/)Hmmm... Since Volvo
              has publicly announced that it "will assume the
              liability, the liability problem is solved as well as
              the safety problem, so all that stands in the way is
              Madison Avenue / Mad Men created nostalgia. Alain

Some other thoughts

          that deserve your

The clockspeed dilemma:What does it mean for automotive innovation

      G. Silberg, Nov '15 "...The auto industry must reconcile these
      two different rates of change. It must act as if it were
      simultaneously in two worlds, moving at two different speeds.
      To do so is what successful innovation now means. It is
      inspiring. Innovation in the current auto space will transform
      the very nature of transportation and change people's lives
      along the way....Personal miles will soar.  Younger and older
      age groups are making small changes in their mobility
      decisions that will drive big changes in personal miles
      traveled... Read more Hmmm...  PMT
          (Personal Miles Traveled) will increase, increasing
          Quality-of-Life (why else would one travel?  As we all
          know, the only value of travel is to improve one's place
          & time utility!  We'll just have to share rides, so
          that VMT (Vehicle...) will decrease, thus also saving the
          planet. Win-win! QED  :-)  Alain

Volvo Cars to develop next generation automotive technologies with Microsoft

      Press Release, Nov 20 "Volvo Cars, the premium car maker, will
      work together with Microsoft, the leading platform and
      productivity company, to jointly develop next generation
      automotive technologies...Areas of future collaboration
      between the two companies could include autonomous driving
      technologies and the utilization of data generated from
      connected cars to create new services..." [Read more](https://www.media.volvocars.com/global/en-gb/media/pressreleases/169675/volvo-cars-to-develop-next-generation-automotive-technologies-with-microsoft) Hmmm...  Microsoft
          following Apple & Google into the Car business???
          Interesting,  See the imbedded video. (I didn't include
          the HoloLens stuff because I'm way to traditional and
          conservative  :-)  )Alain

Hyundai to develop fully autonomous cars by 2030

      P. Igluder, Nov 19 "Hyundai Group will develop highly
      autonomous vehicle technology by 2020 and fully autonomous
      vehicle technology by 2030, Kwon Moon-sik, vice chairman for
      R&D at Hyundai and Kia, said during the second annual
      Heart Dream consumer event in Seoul on Tuesday.

      With Hyundai Motor Group to elaborate in detail on its R&D
      budget for the technology, it earlier this year announced
      R&D investments of $9.75 billion over the next five years
      for future driverless car technology. Included in that amount
      is $2 billion on R&D to Kia Motors -- the country's second
      largest car maker and affiliate of Hyundai Motor's sister
      company -- over the next three years to develop the first of
      its new Advanced Driver Assistance system (ADAS) technologies
      and to recruit more engineers.... "  [Read mor](http://www.zdnet.com/article/hyundai-to-develop-fully-autonomous-cars-by-2030/)e  Hmmm...  $2B/yr in
          R&D; but how much for automation??? Alain

On the More

            Technical Side

Of note publications by K. Kockelman and co-authors:

DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Driving

           C. Chen, A. Seff, A. Kornhauser and J. Xiao.[DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Driving](http://deepdriving.cs.princeton.edu/paper.pdf) Proceedings of 15th IEEE
          International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV2015)

Recompiled Old News

            & Smiles:

Rolls-Royce says it invented the driverless car – with a black tie

Oct 22 “Rolls-Royce has an answer that can only come from a luxury marque when asked if it will develop a driverless car. “I think we invented it,” said the company’s Asia Pacific regional director Paul Harris. “With a chauffeur.”…

“So the self-drive car, I’m not sure it’s really going to give you that option. For me, it seems to be an extension of almost buses really – they’re driving around in certain circles and you ask them to stop at point A, you jump on board and get on with people you don’t know and continue your journey.” Read more Hmmm… Seems like RR may have the clearest view of Self-Driving Cars; which is great for the rest of us.  :-)  .  Alain

The Good Wife Season 7, Episode 7 - “Driven”

C. McGuire, Nov 17 ““If the software learns, then it must not know what it needs to learn, right?”

          An argument—and a very good one at that—could be made that
          The Good Wife, on a macro level, is just one big story
          about how life beats you down. That's why when Alicia
          Florrick (Julianna Margulies) utters the above line in a
          deposition about the perils of trusting a smart car, it
          echoes with irony.... [Read mor](http://www.popmatters.com/review/the-good-wife-season-7-episode-7-driven/)e  Hmmm..  [See episode](http://www.cbs.com/shows/the_good_wife/video/60757E8C-A352-E673-5B77-03A1885FBF6E/the-good-wife-driven/).  Alain

People Are Going to Have a Lot of Sex in Driverless Cars

B. Guarino, Nov 24 “…Will the sex be legal?…“  Hmmm…. I guess I don’t have to encourage you to Read more.  Someone finally had to write about this topic.  Please, I’m just the messenger here.  Alain

Half-baked stuff

            that probably doesn't deserve your time:

Laying the Groundwork for Smart, Connected Cities

Oct 21, 2015 “…U.S. DOT’s Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) has released a white paper that presents a vision of the smart/connected city and lays the groundwork for future research….”Read moreHmmm….The white paper was obsolescent when it was written last year and  is obsolete on its release today.  Practical use of the connected data requires at least some up-front automated processing in order to make it “smart” (whatever that is).  Alain

Self-Driving Cars: A Coming Congestion Disaster?

J. Walker “…This leads to a nightmare scenario that University of Washington’s Mark Hollenbeck laid out in our recent Seattle Times panel.  Paraphrasing Mark:  A suburban father rides his driverless car to work, maybe dropping his daughter off at school.  But rather than park the car downtown, he simply tells it to drive back home to his house in the suburbs.  During the day, it runs some other errands for his family.  At 3 pm, it goes to the school to bring his daughter home or chauffeur her to after-school activities.  Then it’s time for it to drive back into the city to pick up Dad from work.  But then, on a lark, Dad decides to go shopping at a downtown department store after work, so he tells his car to just circle the block for an hour while he shops, before finally hailing it to go home …”   Read more Hmmm…OK, one “less than stellar” scenario.  A more plausible one is that the local mass transit company (or Uber, or ALKaTaxiCorp, or ???) purchases a fleet of these vehicles and manages then efficiently offering an on-demand ride-sharing level-of-service so that the suburban father now only owns a “55 Chevy” to tool around in on weekends while he and his family happily use the new “mass” transit to get to/from where ever. That’s Human Transit! Alain

###

C’mon Man! (These folks

          didn't get/read the memo)

###

Calendar

                  of Upcoming Events:

##

http://www.automatedfl.com/our-efforts/florida-automated-vehicles-summit/

###

###

##

Technix 2016 Envision Automated Transit (EAT) Saturday, January 9th, 2016

                                        9:30 am – 4:00 pm

                                        Kim Engineering Building,
                                        University of Maryland

                                        8228 Paint Branch Dr.,
                                        College Park, MD 20742

                                        Open to the public

http://www.advancedtransit.org/library/news/technix-2016-envision-automated-transit-eat/

The Business of Autonomous Vehicles

March 22-23, 2016

                                                Crowne Plaza Hotel,
                                                San Francisco
                                                Airport

http://driverlessmarket.com/

Recent

                                          Versions of:

#

###

                                                November 15, 2015

Google Just Open Sourced TensorFlow, Its Artificial Intelligence Engine

C. Mertz, Nov 9, “…The app uses an increasingly powerful form of artificial intelligence called deep learning. By analyzing thousands of photos of gravestones, this AI technology can learn to identify a gravestone it has never seen before. The same goes for cats and dogs, trees and clouds, flowers and food….” Read more   Hmmmm…

                                            And we think it can
                                            identify the salient
                                            features of the driving
                                            environment to provide
                                            an elegant algorithm for
                                            autonomous driving.
                                            These tools will allow
                                            more of us to contribute
                                            to contribute to the
                                            development of
                                            SmartDrivingCars.  Alain

                                                October 31, 2015

Port Authority Unanimously Approves $10 Billion Plan to Replace Bus Terminal

A Siff, Oct 22 “The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey has unanimously approved an estimated $10 billion plan to replace the existing 65-year-old bus terminal.

                                        The plan approved Thursday
                                        includes an international
                                        design competition. The
                                        final design will be picked
                                        in September." [See Video](http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/NYC-Port-Authority-Bus-Terminal-Replaced-Plan-Board-Meeting-Vote-335720501.html)

                                            Hmmm... This is great,
                                            but since it will not be
                                            finished for 15 years,
                                            it better be designed
                                            with SmartDrivingBuses
                                            in mind.  In fact, [20 years ago, Lou Pignataro and I envisioned](http://orfe.princeton.edu/%7Ealaink/SmartDrivingCars/FtMonmouth/alain%27s%20ahs%20xbl%20Pro%2010-95.pdf) that
                                            today's longitudinal and
                                            lateral control systems
                                            could readily allow a
                                            50% increase in the
                                            capacity (from a current
                                            max of 700  to 1,050
                                            buses/hr) of the
                                            Counter-flow Exclusive
                                            Bus (XBL) lane/Lincoln
                                            Tunnel if only the PA
                                            Bus Terminal could
                                            accommodate the
                                            additional buses.  This
                                            enable an additional
                                            17,500 seated passengers
                                            per hour to commute from
                                            NJ to NYC, a volume that
                                            is essentially
                                            equivalent to what a new
                                            rail tunnel would
                                            provide.  Hopefully, the
                                            PANY&NJ accommodate
                                            such a service
                                            improvement when they
                                            design and build this
                                            new bus terminal.  Alain

                                                October 23, 2015

###

Should Autopilot Cars Be Required To Pass Driving Tests?

J. Gorzelany Oct 22, “Every state in the union requires motorists to pass a battery of tests in order to be licensed, so why not self-driving vehicles? That’s a notion recently discussed in a white paper written by Michael Sivak and Brandon Schoettle of the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute…“  Read moreHmmmm…

                                          [See the UofM white paper: Should We Require Licensing ...](http://www.umich.edu/%7Eumtriswt/PDF/UMTRI-2015-33_Abstract_English.pdf).

                                            Of course!  The question
                                            is now, what should that
                                            test be?  Should it
                                            simply be the same test
                                            as administered today,
                                            but with the car doing
                                            it as opposed to the
                                            human (that means the
                                            automated car is empty
                                            except the examiner
                                            riding shotgun barking
                                            out instructions) or is
                                            it a progressive exam
                                            coupled with a well
                                            defined set of
                                            conditions under which
                                            the automated
                                            functionalities are
                                            "engage-able" (For
                                            example: NJ Turnpike
                                            Southbound between
                                            mileposts X and Y, in
                                            lanes 2 and 3 of the
                                            "truck barrel" between
                                            sunrise and sunset,
                                            without heavy rain,
                                            sleet, snow or fog;
                                            etc.)  or ??? as in the
                                            report.   Alain

                                                October 19, 2015

###

Self-Driving Cars Are Coming Right For Us

Stephen C. Oct 16 “… It seems like every billionaire with a tech company is working on a self-driving car, so they’re coming whether you like it or not…” See Video  Hmmmm….

                                            Well worth watching.  As
                                            well as Video1,
                                          [Video2,](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yCAZWdqX_Y)
                                            [Video 3](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrwxEX8qOxA), [Video4](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wY9oeCa4ATw),
                                            [Video@night](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYBV9Dqmsxs):-)
                                            Alain

                                              October 08, 2015

###

US urged to establish nationwide Federal guidelines for autonomous driving

Oct 7 “The US risks losing its leading global position in the development of self-driving cars if it allows a patchwork of varying state laws and regulations to develop, according to Håkan Samuelsson, president and chief executive of Volvo Cars.

                                        In a speech to be delivered
                                        Thursday at a high level
                                        seminar on self-driving cars
                                        organized by Volvo Cars and
                                        the Embassy of Sweden in
                                        Washington DC, Mr Samuelsson
                                        will say...

He will urge regulators to work closely with car makers to solve controversial outstanding issues such as questions over legal liability in the event that a self-driving car is involved in a crash or hacked by a criminal third party.

                                        Mr Samuelsson will clearly
                                        state Volvo's position on
                                        both of these contentious
                                        issues.

He will say Volvo will accept full liability whenever one if its cars is in autonomous mode, making it one of the first car makers in the world to make such a promise.

                                        He will add that Volvo
                                        regards the hacking of a
                                          car as a criminal offense.
                                        ...."[Read more](https://www.media.volvocars.com/global/en-gb/media/pressreleases/167975/us-urged-to-establish-nationwide-federal-guidelines-for-autonomous-driving)

                                            Hmmmm...   Fantastic!!!
                                            This will really "shake
                                            'em up".  I'll be on a
                                            panel at this meeting
                                            later this morning.
                                            Can't wait!!!  This is
                                            FANTASTIC!!!Alain [See also](http://www.popsci.com/volvo-on-self-driven-car-liability-i-volunteer)

                                                October 02, 2015

###

“60 Minutes” test-rides Mercedes-Benz self-driving car

Oct 2 “As Google’s driverless cars have logged more then a million miles in the past six years, the rest of the auto industry is racing to keep up. Computer scientist Ralf Herrtwich hits the road with “60 Minutes” correspondent Bill Whitaker to demonstrate Mercedes-Benz’s most advanced self-driving prototype. Watch the full story Sunday on “60 Minutes.”  Watch video and watch 60 minutes on Sunday Oct 4. This is really becoming mainstream. Congratulations Ralf! Alain

                                                September 26, 2015

As Volkswagen Pushed to Be No. 1, Ambitions Fueled a Scandal

D. Hakim, Sept 26 “…It is not Volkswagen’s first run-in with regulators over emissions. When the United States began regulating tailpipe pollutants in the 1970s, Volkswagen was one of the first companies caught cheating. It was fined $120,000 in 1973 for installing what became known as a “defeat device,” technology to shut down a vehicle’s pollution control systems. This time, it equipped its vehicles with software that was programmed to fake test results, an action the E.P.A. rebuked in 1998, when it reached a $1 billion settlement with truck-engine manufacturers for doing the same thing…..

                                        Cheating on emissions tests
                                        solved several issues at
                                        once. Not only were drivers
                                        rewarded with better mileage
                                        and performance, but the
                                        automaker also avoided more
                                        expensive and cumbersome
                                        pollution-control systems.  While

                                        Volkswagen cheated behind
                                        the scenes, it publicly
                                        espoused virtue. This, after
                                        all, is the company that
                                        used one of the largest
                                        advertising arenas in the
                                        world, the [Super Bowl, to run a commercial](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljI2S7rwZ1Y%20)showing its engineers
                                        sprouting angel's wings.

                                        ...Confronted again,
                                        Volkswagen continued to
                                        maintain that there was a
                                        problem with the testers,
                                        not the
                                        vehicles...Government
                                        officials then increased the
                                        pressure on the company,
                                        threatening to withhold
                                        approval for its 2016
                                        Volkswagen and Audi diesel
                                        models. According to the
                                        E.P.A., that is what forced
                                        Volkswagen's hand. On Sept.
                                        3, a group of senior
                                        engineers admitted what the
                                        regulators had suspected:
                                        .... " [Read more](http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/27/business/as-vw-pushed-to-be-no-1-ambitions-fueled-a-scandal.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0)      Hmmm...So

                                            UGLY!!! Alain

                                                September 14, 2015

###

###

Automakers Will Make Automatic Braking Systems Standard in New Cars

B. Vlasic, Sept 11 “ Federal regulators said on Friday that 10 automakers had agreed to install automatic braking systems, which use sensors to detect potential collisions, as standard equipment in new vehicles.

                                        But the automakers have not
                                        set a timetable for the
                                        introduction of the systems,
                                        ...Anthony Foxx, [the transportation secretary, said](http://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/us-dot-and-iihs-announce-historic-commitment-10-automakers-include-automatic-emergency) in a prepared
                                        statement that emergency
                                        braking technology could
                                        reduce traffic deaths and
                                        injuries.

                                        "We are entering a new era
                                        of vehicle safety, focusing
                                        on preventing crashes from
                                        ever occurring, rather than
                                        just protecting occupants
                                        when crashes happen," Mr.
                                        Foxx said....

                                        The 10 companies "will work
                                        with I.I.H.S. and N.H.T.S.A.
                                        in the coming months on the
                                        details of implementing
                                        their historic commitment,"
                                        the National Highway Traffic
                                        Safety Administration said
                                        in [a statement](http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/nhtsa-iihs-commitment-on-aeb-09112015) (Same
                                            as the DoT Statement.)
                                          [Read more](http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/09/12/business/automakers-will-make-automatic-braking-systems-standard-in-new-cars.html)  Hmmm...
                                          This is
                                            major because the
                                            automakers "had
                                            agreed..." rather than
                                            "the regulators had
                                            required..."  (although
                                            there seems to be a
                                            little push-back in that
                                            "...had not set a
                                            timetable..."  We do
                                            know that many are now
                                            offering these systems
                                            at a modest up-sell.  So
                                            there may actually be
                                            substance in the
                                            announcement.)  What is
                                            clear now is that we
                                            should all Invest in
                                            insurance companies that
                                            are creative in insuring
                                            these new vehicles!!!
                                             They are going to
                                            become so profitable!
                                            Insurance gets the cash
                                            benefit of the
                                            technology without
                                            having to pay for it!!!
                                            Wow!!!Congratulations
                                            Warren Buffett.  He must
                                            have played a role in
                                            this.  He stands to
                                            benefit so much.  :-)
                                            While trucks are
                                            mentioned, (amazing

                                                that buses aren't;
                                                DoT is SO BAD!!), they

                                            seem very much the
                                            stepchild.  SO
                                            unfortunate! :-(   Alain

                                                August 28, 2015

Truck Safety Out of the Box from Autonobox

B Simpson, July 19, 2015 “The premise is promising. Develop and market a plug-and-play, forward-avoidance braking system for the heavy vehicle market that can be installed quickly, upgraded regularly, and even transferred from vehicle to vehicle if necessary.

                                        The Autonobox System
                                        essentially is a second
                                        braking system for
                                        heavy-duty vehicles that
                                        addresses the long-standing
                                        problem of brakes that
                                        overheat after intense use
                                        like a panic-stop or
                                        sustained use while going
                                        downhill.... [Read more](http://www.driverlesstransportation.com/truck-safety-out-of-the-box-from-autonobox-9450)  Hmmm...A

                                            viable after-market
                                            retro-fit opportunity.
                                            Alain

                                                August 10, 2015

###

Self-Driving Cars Could Destroy Fine-Based City Government. What’s the Downside?

S. Shackford, July 15 “One of the propelling concepts behind self-driving cars isn’t just innovation for the sake of innovation, leading us to our sci-fi Jetsons future. If successfully implemented, it will make ground travel safer, …Local governments have become increasingly dependent on human screw-ups as a way to raise money. Speeding tickets. DUI citations. Parking violations. Those are all big money-makers for municipalities that could very well go away under a regime of self-driving cars….On top of that, if the theory that self-driving cars will lead people to own fewer cars holds up, revenue from registration fees will drop as well…. Read more Hmmm…  No downside here!  These have to be one of the most regressive tax systems, just behind lotteries and gambling. Governments deserve it, but will save because they will need way police police who now waste way too much of their time enforcing traffic laws.  Police have much better things to do. Wins all around; No Downside! Alain

                                                July 31, 2015

###

Lipinski Continues Efforts to Keep Cars and Other Transportation Safe from Cyber Attacksin Wake

                                        of [Fiat Chrysler Recall](http://www.wsj.com/articles/fiat-chrysler-recalls-1-4-million-vehicles-amid-hacking-concerns-1437751526)

July 28 “…These vulnerabilities pose great risks and the federal government must do more to help protect Americans from these risks.”

Late last year, the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act, originally introduced by Congressmen Lipinski, was signed into law.  The Act increases the security of federal networks and information systems, improves the transfer of cybersecurity technologies to the marketplace, trains a cybersecurity workforce, and coordinates and prioritizes federal cybersecurity research and development efforts.  “ Read more Hmmm…

                                            Besides protecting we
                                            must also prosecute.
                                            There has to be bad
                                            consequences and not
                                            notoriety to those that
                                            do the nasty deed.
                                            Alain

                                                July 27, 2015

###

###

###

Center for Automated Road Transportation Safety @ Fort Monmouth is Launched

Monday, July 20, 2015 – “After more than three (3) years of planning and several major meetings the substantive launch the Center for Automated Road Transportation Safety @ Fort Monmouth (CARTS@FM) occurred this week with the establishment of the not-for-profit. (501(c) (6)), New Jersey Corporation.  The mission of this Center is to substantially improve safety on our existing conventional roadway infrastructure through the use of inexpensive automated collision avoidance systems installed on individual vehicles operating harmoniously with conventional vehicles throughout most, if not all, existing roadways.   The scope of CARTS’s mission is across all modes that utilize the nation’s conventional road system: trucks, buses and cars. ..” Read more

                                                July 3, 2015

###

Rep. Lipinski Introduces Future Transportation Research and Innovation Act

I. Sancken 03/29/15, “Congressman Dan Lipinski (IL-3) has introduced H.R. 2886, the Future Transportation Research and Innovation for Prosperity (TRIP) Act, to support innovative technologies that have the potential to fundamentally alter mobility in America and beyond.

                                        "Surface transportation used
                                        to be rather staid and
                                        unimaginative, but today the
                                        very concept of 'mobility'
                                        is being reinvented through
                                        research, innovation, and
                                        entrepreneurship," said Rep.
                                        Lipinski. "Rapidly advancing
                                        automation, connectivity,
                                        and information technologies
                                        are creating incredible
                                        opportunities for
                                        transportation innovation.
                                        We need to develop
                                        innovative ways to improve
                                        safety, ease congestion,
                                        improve personal mobility,
                                        and cut energy use..."  [Read more](http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/la-grange/community/chi-ugc-article-rep-lipinski-introduces-future-transportatio-2015-06-29-story.html#page=1)  Hmmm...
                                            Excellent!  Alain

                                                June 10, 2015

###

NTSB Calls for Immediate Action on Collision Avoidance Systems for Vehicles; Cites Slow Progress as Major Safety Issue

6/8/15 “ WASHINGTON – In a report released today, the National Transportation Safety Board outlined the life-saving benefits of currently available collision avoidance systems, and recommended that the technology become standard on all new passenger and commercial vehicles.

                                        "You don't pay extra for
                                        your seatbelt," said
                                        Chairman Christopher A.
                                        Hart. "And you shouldn't
                                        have to pay extra for
                                        technology that can help
                                        prevent a collision
                                        altogether."... [Read more](http://www.ntsb.gov/news/press-releases/Pages/PR20150608b.aspx)  Hmmm
                                          Yea!!!  Finally
                                            some semblance of sanity
                                            in Washington.  Alain

                                                May 29, 2015

###

###

John F. Nash Jr., Math Genius Defined by a ‘Beautiful Mind,’ Dies at 86

E. Goodmay, May 24 “…Dr. Nash and his wife, Alicia, 82, were in a taxi on the New Jersey Turnpike in Monroe Township around 4:30 p.m. when the driver lost control while veering from the left lane to the right and hit a guardrail and another car, Sgt. Gregory Williams of the New Jersey State Police said.

                                        The couple were ejected from
                                        the cab and pronounced dead
                                        at the scene. The State
                                        Police said it appeared that
                                        they had not been wearing
                                        seatbelts.... [Read more](http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/25/science/john-nash-a-beautiful-mind-subject-and-nobel-winner-dies-at-86.html)

                                        See also:  [John, Alicia Nash Remembered After Fatal Crash](http://www.towntopics.com/wordpress/2015/05/27/john-alicia-nash-remembered-after-fatal-crash/)

A Beautiful Mind Mathematician John Nash and His Wife Killed in N.J. Car Crash ;

Hmmm…

                                            So tragic!!! What

                                            a crying shame!!! So
                                            preventable!!! We
                                            will miss them :-(

Unfortunately,

                                            the NYT and others tried
                                            but missed the
                                            fundamental point by
                                            following up with ["Deaths of Math Genius John F. Nash Jr. and Wife Show Need to Use Seatbelts in Back, Experts Say](http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/26/nyregion/deaths-of-math-genius-john-f-nash-jr-and-his-wife-show-need-to-use-seatbelts-in-back-experts-say.html)
                                            ".  Why do we so easily
                                            put up with crashes in
                                            the first place?  It is
                                            as if it is OK to go
                                            around crashing, just
                                            put on a seat belt.
                                            Technology is available
                                            to avoid crashes, but
                                            there isn't sufficient
                                            public policy focus on
                                            avoiding crashes to
                                            accelerate its adoption
                                            and enhancement.

                                            The fundamental problem

                                            was that the taxi was not
                                            equipped with available
                                            automated stability
                                            control, lane keeping
                                            and collision avoidance
                                            systems.  This was not
                                            an accident, it was a
                                            failed public safety
                                            policy that refuses to
                                            move beyond crash
                                            mitigation and its
                                            challenged "V2x"
                                            initiatives to embrace
                                            forthright automated
                                            crash avoidance.

Moreover,

                                                there is a failed
                                                Taxi regulatory
                                                structure that
                                                doesn't even hint
                                                that taxis should
                                                have electronic
                                                stability control,
                                                automated lane
                                                keeping and
                                                collision
                                                avoidance.  What is
                                                the purpose of taxi
                                                regulation, to keep
                                                "Ubers" out of
                                                business?

It

                                            is time for the nation's
                                            transportation policy to
                                            focus intelligence/automation
                                            on the vehicle in
                                            support of the driver.
                                          Hopefully

                                            Congress will
                                            restructure the pending
                                            transportation
                                            legislation to focus
                                            automated vehicle
                                            technologies that
                                            actively assist drivers
                                            when they make driving
                                            mistakes.  We are not
                                            perfect.  We deserve a
                                            public safety policy
                                            that is more mindful of
                                            our imperfections.
                                            Policy that isn't aimed
                                            at just warning and
                                            scolding us but actively
                                            takes over and does the
                                            right thing.  We, not
                                                the infrastructure,
                                            are the cause of most of
                                            the the highway
                                            carnage.  It is the
                                            driver who needs help
                                            and our public policy
                                            should focus on
                                            delivering that help.
                                              Alain

  Mailto:alaink@princeton.edu 

                                                      This list is
                                                      maintained by
                                                      [Alain Kornhauser](mailto:alaink@princeton.edu) and hosted by
                                                      the [Princeton University LISTSERV](http://lists.princeton.edu).

Unsubscribe |Re-subscribe


This list is maintained by Alain Kornhauser and hosted by the Princeton University LISTSERV.