Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2016

Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2016

SmartDrivingCars-????-021816

Thursday, March 3, 2016

THE ROAD NOT TAKEN: How we found (and lost) the dream of Personal Rapid Transit

      A. Robertson, Feb 10 , Feb. "...Half a century after its
      heyday, the Alden StaRRcar clearly wasn't made for its world.
      It looks like a white flatiron with wheels or a sleek, plastic
      bullet, dwarfed by the regal sedans of 1960s Detroit. It
      belongs in one of Buckminster Fuller's domed cities, a vehicle
      for traveling under the geodesics of a bubble-topped
      Manhattan. Its future wasn't one of highways, but of narrow
      cement tracks looping gracefully between city and suburb,
      connecting increasingly alienated parts of the American
      landscape...

      Once considered a key to solving urban blight, the StaRRcar
      was part of a public transit revolution that never was — but
      one that would help launch one of the weirdest and most
      politicized public infrastructure experiments of the 20th
      century. It's an old idea that today, in an age of
      self-driving cars, seems by turns impractically retro and
      remarkably prescient...

      PRT's invention is attributed to a transportation expert named
      Donn Fichter, but the central idea was conceived, remixed, and
      adapted by many in the 1950s and 1960s. While the details
      varied, the prototypical PRT system was a network of narrow
      guideways populated by small passenger pods. When commuters
      arrived, they would hit a button to select a destination,
      calling one of the pods like a taxi. Then, instead of running
      on a set line, the pod would use guideways like a freeway
      system, routing around stations in order to take passengers
      directly to their final stop.

      The system was designed to be everything that existing public
      transportation wasn't. Pods would carry only as many people as
      an average car, guaranteeing a nearly private ride. Riders
      wouldn't need to follow a timetable or wait for other people
      to enter and exit the system. Because the pods would only be
      dispatched on demand, cities could run service to many
      low-traffic areas without worrying about waste. There were no
      drivers to train or pay, and the pods could run quietly on
      electrical power instead of with fossil fuels...

      Multiple plans for personal rapid transit fell through,
      whether because of budget problems, logistical issues, or
      political power struggles....

      And as in the '60s, we're talking about whether self-driving
      vehicles could spell the end of private cars...."[Read more](http://orfe.princeton.edu/%7Ealaink/SmartDrivingCars/PDFs/The%20road%20not%20taken%20_%20The%20Verge.html)Hmmmm...A must
          read.  Pretty much as I remember it.  I lived much of it,
          including designing 10,000 station, 10,000 mile PRT
          networks that could serve all of New Jersey's needs for
          personal mobility.  The good news was that the area-wide
          systems would provide great mobility for all.  The bad
          news: No viable way to start.  The best starting places
          could each be readily served by conventional systems with
          no technology risk.  Without a place to start, PRT never
          got a chance to flourish in the vast areas that are
          un-servable by conventional technology.  Moreover, PRT
          needed the diversion of public sector capital funds that
          weres already in the back pocket of those
              pedaling the conventional technologies. Consequently,
              the personal auto has reigned on.

Today is different. With PRT, even the first vehicle needed a couple of stations and interconnecting guideway (and all of the discussion and heartache was about the location and cost of those initial stations and guideway).  With autonomous taxis sharing existing roads, one can begin with a single vehicle capable of serving many existing places without needing to pay-for/justify any infrastructure.   That is today’s

                              fundamental opportunity,
              in contrast to PRT's monumental infrastructure burden
              even for one vehicle.  That's why aTaxis are destined to
          finally deliver PRT's utopian mobility to all and
          substantially transform our cities and suburbs. Alain

Google self-driving car crashes into a bus (update: statement)

      J. Fingas, Feb 29 "It may be the first instance of a Google
      autonomous car being at fault in an accident...."  [Lexus RX450h 2/14/16 DMV Report signed by Chris Urmson](https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/wcm/connect/3946fbb8-e04e-4d52-8f80-b33948df34b2/Google+Auto+LLC+02.14.16.pdf?MOD=AJPERES) [Read more](http://www.engadget.com/2016/02/29/google-self-driving-car-accident/)Hmmmm...had to
          happen, but it was at 2mph.  No big deal.  Alain

ATRI SOLICITING TRUCKING INDUSTRY CRASH COST DATA FOR NEW RESEARCH

Press Release, March 2, “The American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), the trucking industry’s not-for-profit research organization, today launched a new data collection initiative to create a database of motor carrier crash costs by crash type and severity. This data collection will populate ATRI research designed to enable carriers to make better informed Onboard Safety System (OSS) deployment decisions.

        This request for data is targeted toward motor carriers.
        ATRI is also working with its insurance industry
          partners to complete the crash cost database.  [Read more](http://atri-online.org/2016/03/02/atri-soliciting-trucking-industry-crash-cost-data-for-new-research/)   Hmmm... the operative
            word are  "...working with its insurance
          industry partners ..." to
            properly determine what is "self-insured" and what was
            covered by insurance for the accident histories of the
            trucks that have and have not the
            various OSS.  Alain

Scania and Ericsson join forces to improve transport efficiency

      Press release, Feb 25, "...New developments in LTE and 5G
      standardization have created opportunities for dedicated
      vehicle-to-vehicle communications using the mobile network
      while minimizing risks of unpredictability and latency...." [Read more](http://www.ericsson.com/news/1989100)Hmmmm...You mean they are doing it
          without "FHWA"?!  :-) Alain

Varden Labs demonstrates self-driving shuttle at Fresno State

       Feb 23, "Silicon Valley-based [Varden Labs](http://vardenlabs.com/) showed off its
      electric, autonomous shuttle at Fresno State, . Rides were given to students, staff and media. The
      demonstration is part of a series of events hosted by the
      university's Lyles College of Engineering to commemorate
      National Engineers Week."  [Read more](http://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/article62075392.html)Hmmmm...See video to
          view early version of an emerging product. Alain

NVIDIA Puts Pedal to the Metal in New Jersey, Opens Auto Tech Office in Storied Bell Labs Site

       Feb 23, "This week, NVIDIA is opening a new office in New
      Jersey, where we'll focus on developing software for
      self-driving cars on our artificial intelligence DRIVE PX
      platform. AI and deep learning are playing a critical role in
      advances in driver assistance and ultimately autonomous
      vehicles.

      The new NVIDIA space, coincidentally, is in the former Bell
      Labs building, in Holmdel, New Jersey, where deep learning
      pioneer Yann LeCun invented convolutional networks back in the
      late 1980s. These networks are instrumental to deep learning
      in general, and to the work of our team in particular." [Read more](http://www.fresnobee.com/news/local/article62075392.html)Hmmmm...Given the
          work that we are doing at Princeton University in Deep
          Learning ([DeepDriving](http://deepdriving.cs.princeton.edu/))
          and that of MobilEye's Andras Ferencz
          who works in Princeton, the addition of NVDIA's intiatives
          in this are make New Jersey is the focal center of
          image-based software for SmartDrivingCars.  :-)   Alain

DOT opens competition for transportation research grants

Fastlane, Mar.1, “…up to $377.5 million will be available over 5 years to support solution-oriented transportation research at colleges and universities under our University Transportation Centers (UTC) program.  For Fiscal Year 2016, that’s a substantial investment of up to $72.5 million in the talent and ingenuity cultivated in American higher education.

… letter of intent by April 1, 2016, and an application for funding by May 13, 2016. Applicants will compete to join one of 35 UTC consortia; each focused on a major national transportation topic, such as transportation safety or freight mobility…“ Read moreHmmmm…OK. Alain

Responsibility for Vehicle Security and Driver Privacy in the Age of the Connected Car

ICI Opinion, Feb. 2016, “The Connected Car is one of the primary use cases for the Internet of Things (IoT). Yet it is one of the least well understood in terms of cybersecurity. Recent media coverage has exposed critical vulnerabilities to the software that improves performance of the vehicle and the experience of the driver. Similarly, personal data may be collected from cars — for legitimate purposes — that could compromise the privacy of drivers. Veracode commissioned this study to explore how manufacturers are addressing these issues and to understand whether drivers are concerned

        about them....to shed light on:

        What are the cybersecurity implications of the connected
        car?

        Who is responsible for ensuring the applications are secure?

        Where does product liability lie with regard to the
        connected car?

        What are the issues and approaches for personal data and
        privacy?

        What types of applications that are drivers demanding? "

Read more   Hmmmm…Very interesting, but it fails to properly differentiate between “on-board-autonomous-collision-avoidance/ lane-keeping/self-driving” focused on enhancing safety versus “travel-tainment” -oriented connectivity.  In my simple way of thinking it will be a very long time before “connectivity” has any impact on safety.  By its nature “connectivity” delivers nothing by itself.  It needs essentially everyone to be “reading from the same song sheet” in order to be effective.  If it isn’t essentially all, then it is none!  On the contrary, the on-board-autonomous is, by its nature, operating as a one-off in delivering its value.  It doesn’t need anything from anybody.  Consequently, it is largely immune to the security and privacy issues until the incremental benefits of the connectivity outweigh the security and privacy baggage that it brings along.  So for now, it is important to build a strong firewall between the connectivity systems and the “self-driving” systems so as to enable “self-driving” to advance until a time when connectivity has properly addressed the safety and privacy issues, which may not be soon. Alain

Automated Driving & Platooning: Issues & Opportunities

      TMC IR 2015-2 "This Information Report is published by ATA's
      Technology & Maintenance Council (TMC) and examines the
      intensive activity in the development and introduction of
      Automated Vehicles (AVs) and identifies potential issues and
      opportunities for the trucking industry. This report is
      intended to promote better understanding of this emerging
      technology and serve as a platform for discussing key areas of
      interest and concern on the part of commercial fleets.  This
      report was developed by TMC's Automated Driving and Platooning
      Task Force under the auspices of the Council's Future Truck
      Committee."  [Read more](http://www.atabusinesssolutions.com/Default.aspx?TabID=1415&productId=3095480) Hmmmm...Unfortunately, I
          have not been able to get a copy of the report to review
          it.  The above paragraph is encouraging; however, since
          the word "safety" doesn't appear above; nor does
          insurance/liability and "platooning" does appear I am
          suspicious that this may continuing to miss the miss the
          point as to why automation is so vital to improving the
          lives of truck drivers and truck owners. :-(  However,
          there is the [TMC Future Truck Program Position Paper: 2015-3 Recommendations Regarding Automated Driving and Platooning Systems](http://orfe.princeton.edu/%7Ealaink/SmartDrivingCars/PDFs/FT_PP_2015_3.pdf) which refers to this report.  ???? )Alain

Geneva: Volvo announces Pilot Assist II updates

      Mar. 2, "Volvo Cars has announced a wide range of updates for
      model year 2017, including the introduction of its latest
      semi-autonomous drive technology, Pilot Assist II, as standard
      on the XC90 in selected markets.    The introduction of Pilot
      Assist II on XC90 is made possible thanks to the modular
      approach to car building enabled by Volvo's new SPA
      architecture. Introduced first in the new S90 premium sedan,
      Pilot Assist II supports drivers up to speeds of 130 km/h in
      well-marked highway conditions.

      City Safety updated:  Volvo has also expanded its safety
      technology to cover one of the most common causes of single
      vehicle accidents with Run-off road mitigation, which uses
      auto-steer to help keep you on the road. Volvo's standard
      collision avoidance system, City Safety, also receives an
      update with Large Animal Detection added on 90 Series
      cars....."  [Read mor](http://safecarnews.com/volvo-announces-pilot-assist-ii-updates-fe7262/)e Hmmmm...At least
          they are not over-hyping and it operates at speeds up to
          130km/hr.  Thank you.  (If you want to go faster than
          130km/hr, please stay far away from me. :-)  ) . Alain

STMicroelectronics Reveals Most Highly Integrated Automotive 77GHz Radar Chip for Emerging Long-Range Applications

      Press release, Feb 23, "STMicroelectronics (NYSE: STM), a
      global semiconductor leader serving customers across the
      spectrum of electronics applications and the world's largest
      supplier of short- and mid-range (24GHz) radar chips for
      Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), is now supplying
      its latest long-range (77GHz) radar chips to leading
      automotive customers..."[Read more](http://www.st.com/web/en/press/p3809)Hmmmm...Excellent. Alain

Harbrick Goes West, Harvests Funds

###

Feb 17, “Autonomous driving technology is growing fast, and startups like Harbrick Technologies are growing with it. The developer of the popular middleware plug-in PolySync has raised money, hired top technology executives, and moved to the West Coast, all in the last quarter or so….” Read more Hmmmm…Congratulations!!.

            Alain

Some other thoughts

          that deserve your attention

Geneva: Volvo announces Pilot Assist II updates

      Feb 29, "The World Trade Center Transportation Hub, opening
      Thursday, gives the city an Instagram-ready attraction and the
      most expensive train station ever...  The project's cost
      soared toward a head-slapping, unconscionable $4 billion in
      public money for what, in effect, is the 18th-busiest subway
      stop in New York City, tucked inside a shopping mall, down the
      block from another shopping center....Meanwhile, the city has
      an Instagram-ready attraction whose defenders insist no one
      will remember it is the most expensive train station ever. Who
      recalls how much Grand Central cost?

      Actually, I do. It cost $80 million, or about half the cost of
      the hub, adjusting for inflation, which was private, not
      public, money. Grand Central spurred a building boom that
      transformed the surrounding blocks and the city's economy.
      This new hub is shoehorned into an unfinished office park in
      Lower Manhattan whose development it has complicated, not
      hastened — while the whole area has been evolving into a
      livelier live-work neighborhood despite what's happening at
      the World Trade Center, not because of it..."[Read more](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/03/arts/design/santiago-calatravas-transit-hub-is-a-soaring-symbol-of-a-boondoggle.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=image&module=photo-spot-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news)Hmmmm...Unbelievable!.

          Has the public sector doing anything right lately in the
          transportation arena?  :-( Alain

Welcome to Competitive Drone Racing

      D. Ferry, Mar. 2 "How do you start a new sport from scratch? A
      former Tough Mudder executive and other entrepreneurs around
      the world are about to find out...."The best drone pilots in
      the world have come together here," the reporter intones, "to
      face off against one another and a racecourse built for
      speed!" The countdown begins: three, two, one! A bell rings
      and the machines rise off the launch pad then accelerate
      through neon-lit gates, into the concourse, then up a circular
      staircase. They hit speeds above 80 mph.  Welcome to the
      qualifying rounds of the Drone Racing League's inaugural
      season..." [Read more](http://www.outsideonline.com/2059086/welcome-competitive-drone-racing)
          Hmmmm....Interesting!   Certainly a step up from video
          games. Alai

Woman, 77, Fatally Struck by Livery Cab in Midtown

      N. Remnick, Feb. 29," ...... was crossing Madison Avenue at
      36th Street just after 8:30 a.m. on Monday, a few blocks from
      her apartment and the costume jewelry company that she started
      more than 35 years ago, when a black livery cab turned and
      struck her, pinning her under the car...." [Read more](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/01/nyregion/woman-77-fatally-struck-by-livery-cab-in-midtown.html)Hmmmm....How do these
          tragedies continue to plague us when Automated Collision
          Avoidance Systems (ACAS) that can mitigate such tragedies
          remain sitting on the shelves of the OEMs.  These systems
              must be adopted NOW. Since NHTSA wont
          mandate them, Insurers must make their adoption
          "intuitively obvious to the most casual observer"!
          Insurance should either cease cross-subsidizing drivers of
          so unequipped cars or simply buy the systems for them and
          enjoy the cascading increase in profits.  It is now
          abundantly clear that the  insurance risk associated with
          a pool of ACAS-equipped vehicles is substantially smaller
          than that of a pool of vehicle not-ACAS-equipped.
          Moreover, that difference, at least associated with
          transit buses, is greater than the market price of the
          ACAS option.  Insurance rates must begin to reflect this
          disparity!  Alain

Welcome to the Smart Mobility newsletter

The last few years’ massive work on self-driving vehicles is now changing gear and traditional vehicle manufacturers, like Ford, as well as new players are increasingly looking at using automation to design new mobility services.    This newsletter aims to keep its readers abreast of just that; new exciting concepts within the field of Smart Mobility. ..” Read moreHmmmm….Welcome Jan! Alain

Slowly Fulfilling the Promise of Watson

S. Lohr, Feb289 “When IBM’s Watson computer triumphed over human champions in the quiz show “Jeopardy!” it was a stunning achievement that suggested limitless horizons for artificial intelligence.

        Soon after, IBM's leaders moved to convert Watson from a
        celebrated science project into a moneymaking business,
        starting with health care.  Yet the next few years after its
        game show win proved humbling for Watson. Today, IBM
        executives candidly admit that medicine proved far more
        difficult than they anticipated. Costs and frustration
        mounted on Watson's early projects. They were scaled back,
        refocused and occasionally shelved.  IBM's early struggles
        with Watson point to the sobering fact that commercializing
        new technology, however promising, typically comes in short
        steps rather than giant leaps..." [Read more](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/29/technology/the-promise-of-artificial-intelligence-unfolds-in-small-steps.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=wide-thumb&module=mini-moth&region=top-stories-below&WT.nav=top-stories-below)Hmmmm...Very
            interesting.  Alain

When ‘Symptoms of Television’ Began Their Inexorable Spread

      N. Bakalar, Feb 29,  "It was a problem everyone knew was
      solvable, but one that had yet to be solved.

      Engineers, inventors and tinkerers had been working on
      "telemotion," the "televista," the "photo-telegraph," the
      "tele-vision" in various forms, using well-known technologies
      and off-the-shelf equipment, since the early 20th century.
      The New York Times first mentioned the idea — it was still
      only an idea — on Feb. 24, 1907, in an article announcing the
      first successful transmission of photographs by wire.  "The
      new 'telephotograph' invention of Dr. Arthur Korn," the
      anonymous reporter wrote, "assures us that 'television,' or
      seeing by telegraph, is merely a question of a year or two
      with certain improvements in apparatus...." [Read more](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/01/science/television-history.html?ref=technology)Hmmmm...More
          perspective on technological change.  Alain

On the More Technical Side

http://orfe.princeton.edu/~alaink/SmartDrivingCars/Papers/

Comments on Proposed AV Regulations in California

R. Peterson, Feb 23, “…Although section 38750 attempts to assign the regulation of “autonomous vehicles” to the DMV, the definition of “autonomous vehicle” was unworkable and outdated soon after its adoption.  The definition attempts to draw a distinction between systems that “enhance safety or provide driver assistance” (listing, but not limiting them to a list of systems that existed at the time), but attempts to exclude from these safety enhancing features, those technologies “capable” of driving the vehicle “without active control or monitoring of a human operator.”

        There are two faults in this definition.  First, it seems to
        attempt a distinction between safety enhancing features and
        autonomous vehicles.  This is a false dichotomy.  By taking
        drunk, distracted, careless, and sleepy human drivers with
        their limited skills out of the primary role of driving,
        autonomous technology is safety enhancing.  It just happens
        to bring in its train a number of additional utilities and
        benefits that most safety features do not deliver.  This is
        hardly a vice.

        Secondly, the definition turns on "capability," not the
        OEM's purpose or intention.  227.02(d).  Almost as soon as
        section 38750 was adopted, and before these proposed
        regulations were published, vehicles "capable" of driving
        themselves within the parameters for which they were
        designed were on the roads and legal in every state,
        including California.  [Read more](http://orfe.princeton.edu/%7Ealaink/SmartDrivingCars/Papers/RPeterson_CA_DMV%20_RegsComments032316.pdf) Hmmmm...Excellent.
            Alain

Recompiled Old News &

              Smiles:

###

Half-baked stuff

            that probably doesn't deserve your time:

  ATRI SOLICITING TRUCKING INDUSTRY CRASH COST DATA FOR NEW RESEARCH

Press Release, March 2, “The American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), the trucking industry’s not-for-profit research organization, today launched a new data collection initiative to create a database of motor carrier crash costs by crash type and severity. This data collection will populate ATRI research designed to enable carriers to make better informed Onboard Safety System (OSS) deployment decisions.

          This request for data is targeted toward motor carriers.
          ATRI is also working with its insurance industry
            partners to complete the crash cost database.  [Read more](http://atri-online.org/2016/03/02/atri-soliciting-trucking-industry-crash-cost-data-for-new-research/)   Hmmm... the operative word is  "...working
            with its insurance industry partners ..." to properly determine what is
              Self-insured and what was covered by insurance for the
              accident histories of the trucks that have and
              have not the various OSS.  Alain

Nissan Unveil A New Driverless Version of The Qashqai

        Mar. 2, "Stage one autonomous drive technology will give
        refreshed Nissan Qashqai 'single lane control' in heavy
        traffic conditions on highways...."  [Read mor](http://thinkinghighways.com/nissan-unveil-a-new-driverless-car-the-qashqai/)e Hmmmm...Headline
            grossly exaggerates what's here. Playing catchup, but
            far behind. Alain

###

C’mon Man! (These folks

          didn't get/read the memo)

###

Calendar

                  of Upcoming Events:

The Business of Autonomous Vehicles

March 22-23, 2016

                      Crowne Plaza Hotel, San Francisco Airport

http://driverlessmarket.com/

Recent

                                          Highlights of:

#

###

                                                February 25, 2016 [Vancouver councillor wants city to prepare for driverless cars](http://www.vancouversun.com/news/vancouver+city+councillor+wants+study+impact+driverless+cars/11726263/story.html)  T. Fletcher, Feb
                                        18 "Driverless cars might
                                        seem like a futuristic
                                        dream, but a city councillor
                                        doesn't want Vancouver to
                                        take a hands-off approach to
                                        the emerging technology.
                                        Coun. Geoff Meggs is
                                        steering a motion slated for
                                        next Tuesday's council
                                        meeting asking city staff to
                                        look into the impact of
                                        self-driving vehicles and
                                        how to maximize the benefits
                                        of the technology for
                                        Vancouver and the city's
                                        economy.

                                        Although the city's
                                        transportation 2040 plan,
                                        which outlines a strategy
                                        for how people and goods
                                        will move in and around
                                        Vancouver for the next 30
                                        years, was adopted only four
                                        years ago, Meggs said it
                                        fails to address driverless
                                        technology....  "It may be a
                                        powerful tool or there may
                                        be problems with it, but at
                                        the moment, it's an empty
                                        category in a lot of our
                                        thinking," Meggs told Metro.
                                        "We don't want our
                                        (transportation) plan, which
                                        we just did, to be
                                          obsolete before it even
                                          starts."..."  [Read more](http://www.nsc.org/NewsDocuments/2016/mv-fatality-report-1215.pdf)Hmmmm...Yup!

                                            Obviously, "obsolescence
                                            before ribbon cutting"
                                            is something all cities
                                            should try to avoid.
                                            Alain

                                                February 18, 2016

Motor Vehicle Deaths Increase by Largest Percent in 50 Years

Press Release Feb 16 “With continued lower gasoline prices and an improving economy resulting in an estimated 3.5% increase

                                        in motor-vehicle mileage,
                                        the number of motor-vehicle
                                        deaths in 2015 totaled
                                          38,300, up 8% from
                                          2014.

                                        The 2015 estimate is
                                        provisional and may be
                                        revised when more data are
                                        available. The total for
                                        2015 was up 8% from the 2013
                                        figure. The annual total for
                                        2014 was 35,398, a less than
                                        0.5% increase from 2013. The
                                        2013 figure was 3% lower
                                        than 2012. The estimated
                                        annual population death rate
                                        is 11.87 deaths per 100,000
                                        population, an increase of
                                        7% from the 2014 rate. The
                                        estimated annual mileage
                                        death rate is 1.22 deaths
                                        per 100 million vehicle
                                        miles traveled, an increase
                                        of 5% from the 2014 rate. [Read more](http://www.nsc.org/NewsDocuments/2016/mv-fatality-report-1215.pdf)Hmmmm...This

                                            is REALLY BAD news.
                                            Come on insurance. This
                                            is costing you money!
                                            Accident rates going up
                                            means that your
                                            actuarials are behind,
                                            your regulated pricing
                                            lags and you are losing
                                            money.  To get ahead of
                                            your actuarials, you
                                            MUST incentivize the
                                            adoption of automated
                                            collision avoidance
                                            systems.  You'll then do
                                            very well, thank you AND
                                            help society.  Alain

                                                February 9, 2016

Budget of the U.S. Government, FY 2017

Feb. 9, “…(3) Accelerate the integration of autonomous vehicles, low-carbon technologies, and intelligent transportation systems into our infrastructure….

  • Providing almost $400 million on average per year in funding over the next 10 years for the deployment of self-driving vehicles. Investments would help develop connected infrastructure and smart sensors that can communicate with autonomous vehicles, support R&D to ensure these vehicles are safe and road ready, and expand at-scale deployment projects to provide “proving grounds” for autonomous self-driving and connected vehicles in urban and highway settings.

Read moreHmmmm…major

                                            victory...not only: "...for
                                            autonomous
                                            self-driving...", bit
                                            also stated before: "...
                                            and connected...".
                                                Alain

                                                January 28, 2016

London’s first driverless cars revealed

The consortium behind the trial has decided to adapt electric passenger shuttles that are currently in service at Heathrow Airport for use in Greenwich. Unlike the Heathrow pods, they will not need dedicated tracks.

                                        The Greenwich trial is one
                                        of four in the UK to test
                                        driverless technology and
                                        public reaction to
                                        it..."This vehicle has
                                        millions of miles under its
                                        belt and now we have to take
                                        it outside of the track and
                                        modify it for use on
                                        pavements," he added.  The
                                        so-called UltraPODs
                                        currently in service at
                                        Heathrow carry passengers
                                        between the car park and
                                        Terminal 5. In the five
                                        years they have been in use,
                                        they have carried 1.5
                                        million passengers and
                                        traveled three million
                                        kilometers (1.8 million
                                        miles)...."   [Read more](http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-35432687)   Hmmm...Wow!!

                                              ... PRT
                                                evolving to be
                                                autonomousTaxis!
                                                Wow!!!  :-) Alain

                                                January 14, 2016

###

Obama’s $4 Billion Plan for Self-Driving Cars Will Make Google Very Happy

M. Bergen, Jan 14 “The Obama Administration has seen the self-driving future, and it’s jumping aboard.  At the Detroit auto show on Thursday morning, U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx will unveil a plan to develop a national blueprint for autonomous driving technology within the next six months.  He will also announce that President Obama is planning to insert $4 billion into the 2017 budget for a 10-year plan to support and “accelerate” vehicle automation projects.

                                        "We are on the cusp of a new
                                        era in automotive technology
                                        with enormous potential to
                                        save lives, reduce
                                        greenhouse gas emissions,
                                        and transform mobility for
                                        the American people,"
                                        Secretary Foxx said in a
                                        statement. ...But here's the
                                          part of Foxx's talk that
                                          really matters for Google:
                                          These national rules will
                                          allow fully driverless
                                          cars..." [Read More](http://recode.net/2016/01/14/obamas-4-billion-plan-for-self-driving-cars-will-make-google-very-happy/)  Hmmm...
                                                A [few months ago](http://www.its.dot.gov/press/2015/ngv_tech_announcement.htm) it
                                                was $42M for
                                                Connected Vehicles.
                                                Today it is 100x for
                                                automated vehicles!
                                                Finally Secretary
                                                Foxx.."[YES! YES! JESUS H. TAP-DANCING CHRIST... I HAVE SEEN THE LIGHT](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX5tfRdkoY0)"
                                                      (Blue
                                                      Brothers)
                                                      Yea!!!!!   :-)

                                              Alain

                                                January 3, 2016

Google Pairs With Ford To Build Self-Driving Cars

J. Hyde & S. Carty, Dec. 21 “Google and Ford will create a joint venture to build self-driving vehicles with Google’s technology, a huge step by both companies toward a new business of automated ride sharing, …According to three sources familiar with the plans, the partnership is set to be announced by Ford at the Consumer Electronics Show in January. By pairing with Google, Ford gets a massive boost in self-driving software development; while the automaker has been experimenting with its own systems for years, it only revealed plans this month to begin testing on public streets in California….

                                        Google already has several
                                        links to Ford; the head of
                                        the self-driving car
                                        project, John Krafcik,
                                        worked for 14 years at Ford,
                                        including a stint as head of
                                        truck engineering, and
                                        several other ex-Ford
                                        employees work in the unit
                                        as well. Former Ford chief
                                        executive Alan Mulally
                                        joined Google's board last
                                        year.

                                        And Ford executives have
                                        been clear for years that
                                        the company was ready to
                                        embrace a future where cars
                                        were sold as on-demand
                                        services. Ford CEO Mark
                                        Fields has repeatedly said
                                        Ford was thinking of itself
                                        "as a mobility company," and
                                        what that would mean for its
                                        business" [Read more](https://www.yahoo.com/autos/google-pairs-with-ford-to-1326344237400118.html)  Hmmm...Not

                                                surprising and not
                                                exclusive.
                                                :-) Alain

                                                December 19, 2015

Adam Jonas’ View on Autonomous Cars

Video similar to part of Adam’s Luncheon talk @ 2015 Florida Automated Vehicle Symposium on Dec 1.  Hmmm … Watch Video  especially

                                            at the 13:12 mark.
                                            Compelling; especially
                                            after the 60 Minutes
                                            segment above!  Also see
                                            his [TipRanks](https://www.tipranks.com/analysts/adam-jonas).

                                            Alain

  Mailto:alaink@princeton.edu 

                                                      This list is
                                                      maintained by
                                                      [Alain Kornhauser](mailto:alaink@princeton.edu) and hosted by the [Princeton University LISTSERV](http://lists.princeton.edu).
Unsubscribe Re-subscribe

This list is maintained by Alain Kornhauser and hosted by the Princeton University LISTSERV.