2016-07-11
Lessons From the Tesla Crash
Editorial Board, July 11, "A recent fatal crash in Florida
involving a Tesla Model S is an example of how a new
technology designed to make cars safer could, in some cases,
make them more dangerous. These risks, however, could be
minimized with better testing (Hmmm....Yes!)
and regulations (Still too early, we
don't know enough, yet)...Tesla's electric cars
are not self-driving, but when the Autopilot system is engaged
it can keep the car in a lane, adjust its speed to keep up
with traffic and brake to avoid collisions. Tesla says audio
and visual alerts warn drivers to keep their hands on the
steering wheel and watch the road. If a driver is unresponsive
to the alerts, the car is programmed to slow itself to a stop.
Such warnings aren't sufficient, though; some Tesla drivers,
as shown in videos on YouTube, have even gotten into the back
seat while the car was moving. Such reckless behavior
threatens not just the drivers but everyone else on the road,
too. (Absolutely!)... If
that system ([V2V](http://www.safercar.gov/v2v/index.html)) had
been in place, Mr. Brown might have survived. (Sure, but Mr Brown would have had to
wait more than his normal expected life span before that
system would have been adopted by more than 70% of all
vehicles for it to have better than a "coin flip" chance
of helping him. What would have helped Mr. Brown is if
the Automated Emergency Braking system worked on his
Tesla, or if the truck driver had seen him coming (not become
distracted) and had not "failed to
yield". ) Federal officials could take lessons
from the history of [airbags](http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/01/automobiles/autos-on-friday-safety-when-air-bags-help-and-harm.html)
and the lack of strong regulations. (This
is a VERY appropriate and relevant lesson!)...
The agency does not yet have regulations for driverless cars
or cars that have driver assistance systems. But when
officials do put rules in place, they will have to update them
regularly as they learn about how the technology works in
practice. Automation should save lives. But nobody should
expect these vehicles to be risk-free. (This
is very wise. They should also immediately focus on
Automated Emergency Braking systems which are the
foundation of any Self-driving or Driverless systems. )
[Read more](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/11/opinion/lessons-from-the-tesla-crash.html?ribbon-ad-idx=2&rref=opinion&module=Ribbon&version=context®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Opinion&pgtype=article)Hmmm....Comments in-line above. Alain
Sound Transit’s expansion will be obsolete before it’s built
Opinion, July 9, "...In light of the ACES and the
transformation of urban mobility happening today, does it make
sense for Puget Sound taxpayers to commit to a $54-billion,
25-year transit project that largely will be obsolete before
it is complete?"[Read more](http://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/sound-transits-expansion-will-be-obsolete-before-its-built/)Hmmm....Maybe obsolete even before it is started.
Alain
NHTSA data shows traffic deaths up 7.7 percent in 2015
NHTSA 15-16 July 1, "[Preliminary data](https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812269) released today by the U.S. Department of
Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration show a 7.7 percent increase in motor vehicle
traffic deaths in 2015. An estimated 35,200 people died in
2015, up from the 32,675 reported fatalities in 2014....."As
the economy has improved and gas prices have fallen, more
Americans are driving more miles," said NHTSA Administrator
Dr. Mark Rosekind. "But that only explains part of the
increase. Ninety-four percent of crashes can be tied back to a
human choice or error, so we know we need to focus our efforts
on improving human behavior while promoting vehicle technology
that not only protects people in crashes, but helps prevent
crashes in the first place." ...The U.S. Department of
Transportation is also pressing forward with new guidance to
promote the development of automated safety technologies which
could greatly decrease the number of crashes. NHTSA hosted two
public meetings on automated safety technologies, in advance
of guidance that will be issued later this summer...In March,
the Department of Transportation announced a key safety
agreement with automakers requiring more than 99 percent of
new vehicles to have automatic emergency braking standard by
2022..."[Read more,](http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/nhtsa-2015-traffic-deaths-up-07012016) See [Traffic Safety Facts](https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812269) Hmmm....Let's
hope that the automatic emergency braking that is standard
by 2022works better than the Automated Emergency Braking
(AEB) system in today's Tesla which was "out to lunch" in
Florida on May 7. What is NHTSA doing to make sure that
these AEB systems actually work., aren't "turn-offable"
and have negligible false alarms? Alain
Tesla’s Dubious Claims About Autopilot’s Safety Record
T. Simonite, July 6, "...Tesla and Musk's message is clear:
the data proves Autopilot is much safer than human drivers.
But experts say those comparisons are worthless, because the
company is comparing apples and oranges.
"It has no meaning," says Alain Kornhauser, ...of Tesla's
comparison of U.S.-wide statistics with data collected from
its own cars. Autopilot is designed to be used only for
highway driving, and may well make that safer, but standard
traffic safety statistics include a much broader range of
driving conditions, he says
Tesla's comparisons are also undermined by the fact that its
expensive, relatively large vehicles are much safer in a crash
than most vehicles on the road, says Bryant Walker Smith, an
assistant professor at the University of South Carolina. He
describes comparisons of the rate of accidents by Autopilot
with population-wide statistics as "ludicrous on their face."
Tesla did not respond to a request asking it to explain why
Musk and the company compare figures from very different kinds
of driving...Smith suggests that by releasing more of their
data trove, companies could accelerate development of
self-driving cars, better prove their worth, and inform
efforts to develop ways to hold them to account from a safety
perspective....
Kornhauser at Princeton hopes that companies such as Google
and Tesla will understand that they and society have more to
gain if they do work together.
"They may not want to help the competition, but we're dealing
with other people's lives," he says. "We should have more
public spiritedness in the effort to do this thing." [Read more](https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601849/teslas-dubious-claims-about-autopilots-safety-record/) Hmmm....Yup! Alain
The Truth About Tesla’s Autopilot Is We Don’t Yet Know How Safe It Is
M. Rogowsky, July 11, "...The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety, it turns out, has studied which cars are the safest on
the road for a while. It's [findings are illuminating](http://www.iihs.org/iihs/sr/statusreport/article/50/1/1). A report last year showed that there
are nine vehicles from the 2011 model year with a driver death
rate of zero. Three of the nine are luxury vehicles: the Audi
A4 AWD, the Lexus RX350 AWD and the Mercedes GL AWD. The
Mercedes M AWD comes in 11th on the list with two deaths per
million registered vehicle years (count the number of cars
sold, multiple each by the number of years it was registered,
add it up and you get "registered vehicle years").
Now you may be wondering how one of these vehicles compares to
the Autopilot stats from Tesla. I'll leave that work to Andrew
Hires, a professor of neurobiology at USC. He [tweeted](https://twitter.com/AndrewHires/status/751498559141187585):
"It's a tiny sample. Compare Audi A4. 120,394 vehicle years @
10k mi/yr = 1.2B miles. Deaths = 0." Estimating 10,000 miles
per year is likely low given the average is typically
estimated around 12,000 or more. But irrespective of whether
that estimate was low, it's approximately 10 times the miles
Teslas have logged to date in Autopilot mode. Further, Hires
added: "Statistically, its too early to say Autopilot is safer
than average luxury vehicle. Hard to say for any lux
vehicle!" [Read more](http://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsky/2016/07/11/the-truth-about-teslas-autopilot-is-we-dont-yet-know-how-safe-it-is/2/#30a6e28a16a7) Hmmm....Again, the issue
in this crash is that one vehicle failed to yield that
created a situation for which few car/driver combinations
have survived. Alain
Another Tesla crashes and Autopilot is blamed again
G. Gardner, Jul, 5, "A Southfield, Mich., art gallery owner
told police his [2016 Tesla Model X was in Autopilot mode](http://on.freep.com/29uH1fx) when it crashed and
rolled over on the Pennsylvania Turnpike last week....In his
crash report, Vukovich stated that Scaglione's car was
traveling east near mile marker 160, about 5 p.m. when it hit
a guardrail "off the right side of the roadway. It then
crossed over the eastbound lanes and hit the concrete
median."..." [Read more](http://www.wcsh6.com/news/nation-now/driver-tesla-was-on-autopilot-in-pa-turnpike-crash/264831459) Hmmm... Given that this
one involved lane departure, then indeed, if AutoPilot was
on, then we really need to understand why lane keeping
failed. Alain
Silicon Valley-Driven Hype for Self-Driving Cars
L. Gomes, July 9, "BECAUSE of reports that he may have been
watching a Harry Potter movie at the time, Joshua Brown, the
Tesla owner killed in the self-driving car industry's first
known fatal accident, has come to be regarded as a reckless
contributor to his own sad fate.
Here's another view: Mr. Brown may be the first casualty of
the widespread and potentially dangerous belief that
autonomous cars are much closer to being road-ready than they
actually are...." Hmmm....C'mon
NYT, it has also been refuted that Joshua Brown was
watching Harry Potter and Mr. Brown isn't "the first casualty of the dangerous belief
that" Automated Emergency Braking Systems, the
very foundation of any autonomous car "are much closer to being road-ready than
they actually are".
“Mr. Brown, …, does not appear to have been heeding an important rule in the official instruction manual for the Tesla Autopilot feature he was using: Drivers should keep their hands on the wheel and be ready to resume control of the vehicle at any time.” Don’t read more Hmmm…NO! The Tesla did not veer off the road, it didn’t stop when it was cut off by a truck! If anything, he should have had his foot on the brake. And by the way, why did the driver of the other vehicle cut in front of him??? C’mon NYT!!! “Mr. Brown, …, Instead, he seems to have been answering to a higher authority: Elon Musk, a founder and the chief executive of Tesla Motors. Hmmm…There is simply no evidence supporting such a “seems”. C’mon NYT!!! And “trains” that don’t deliver sufficient desired mobility should be scaled back in preference to other transit mobility solutions that could more effectively, economically and sooner the desired mobility.
This is such a sophomoric article. ..."truly go-anywhere self-driving car"... After 120 years of
development, I can't drive my conventional car to
"truly go-anywhere
self-driving car"!
This article is an embarrassment to NYT.
Some other thoughts
that deserve your attention
The Merging Worlds of Technology and Cars
A. Webb, June 28, “The line between the technology and automotive industries is blurring. The rise of rideshare companies such as Uber and Lyft means that transportation is being tied ever more closely to your cell phone, while autonomous driving technology is turning your car into a computer… “ Read more Hmmm….Interesting graphic of relationships. Alain
The complicated web of companies that will determine the future of cars
C. Huston, July 9, Hmmm….Another interesting graphic of relationships. Alain
Disrupting The Auto Industry: The Startups That Are Unbundling The Car
CB Insight, May 26 “While self-driving tech receives the lion’s share of media attention, a host of less-heralded startups are targeting specific pieces of automotive infrastructure or components…There were 7,700 fewer driver deaths in 2012 alone than there would have been had vehicles remained the same since 1985. (Does this mean that all of the seat belt, airbag and energy absorbtion efforsts over the past 30 years have only reduced deaths by ~20%” Read more Hmmm….And another interesting graphic of relationships. Alain
Autonomous Cars: Giant Raymond James Report Sees Big Opportunity, Long Wait
T. Ray, July 8, “Self-driving cars may be the future, but it’s going to take some time for them to evolve from today’s offerings, according to a longish (32 pages) note out late yesterday from Raymond James’s Tavis McCourt, who charts the evolution of the auto industry for the next 25 years…” Read more Hmmm….Nice listing of deals. Alain
Why you haven’t seen driverless trains
F. Frailey, Aug 2016, “Events are actually pulling railroads in the opposite direction, to their ultimate peril..” Article requires subscription.
On the More Technical Side
http://orfe.princeton.edu/~alaink/SmartDrivingCars/Papers/
Recompiled Old News & Smiles:
SAVING LIVES: Improved vehicle designs bring down death rates
Status eport Vol. 50, No.1, “The chances of dying in a crash in a late-model vehicle have fallen by more than a third in three years, the latest IIHS calculations of driver death rates show. Among 2011 models, a record nine vehicles have driver death rates of zero. However, the gap between the safest and riskiest models remains wide, and three cars have death rates exceeding 100 per million registered vehicle years….” Read more Hmmm….See especially the Tables . It would be interesting to have an update of these tables through 2015 and broken down separating models wit and without Automated Emergency Braking. See also DEATH RATES BY MODEL: SUV drivers are among least likely to be killed. June 2011. Alain
##
Half-baked stuff that probably
doesn't deserve your time:
###
###
C’mon Man! (These folks
didn't get/read the memo)
Calendar of
Upcoming Events:
Sept 15 & 16, 2016 Arlington, VA
Sept 19-21, 2016 Antwerp, Belgium
Recent Highlights of:
#
###
May 7 Crash
Hmmm…What we know now (and don’t know):
1. On May 7, 2016 at about 4:40pm EDT, there was a crash between a Tesla and a Class 8 Tractor-Trailer. The accident is depicted in the Diagram from the Police Report: HSMV Crash Report # 85234095. (1) Google Earth images from the site.
2. The driver of the Tesla was Joshua Brown. “No citations have been issued, but the initial accident report from the FHP indicates the truck driver “failed to yield right-of-way.”” (2) . Hmmm….No Citations??? Did the truck have a data recorder? Was the truck impounded, if so, how is the truck driver making a living since the crash? Why was his truck not equipped with sensors that can warn him of collision risks at intersections? As I’ve written, driving is one of the most dangerous occupations. Why isn’t OSHA concerned about improving the environment of these workers? Why doesn’t ATRI (the American Trucking Association’s research arm recognize the lack availability/adoption of “SmartDrivingTruck technology” as one of its Critical Issues? Why didn’t his insurance agent encourage/convince him to equip his truck with collision risk sensors. If they aren’t commercially available, why hasn’t his insurance company invested/promoted/lobbied for their development? These low-volume rural highway intersections are very dangerous. Technology could help.
“…(the truck driver)…said he saw the Tesla approaching in the left, eastbound lane. Then it crossed to the right lane and struck his trailer. “I don’t know why he went over to the slow lane when he had to have seen me,” he said….” (2) . Hmmm….If the driver saw the Tesla change lanes, why did he “failed to yield right-of-way”???
“…Meanwhile, the accident is stoking the debate on whether drivers are being lulled into a false sense of security by such technology. A man who lives on the property where Brown’s car came to rest some 900 feet from the intersection where the crash occurred said when he approached the wreckage 15 minutes after the crash, he could hear the DVD player. An FHP trooper on the scene told the property owner, Robert VanKavelaar, that a “Harry Potter” movie was showing on the DVD player, VanKavelaar told Reuters on Friday.
Another witness, Terence Mulligan, said he arrived at the
scene before the first Florida state trooper and found
"there was no movie playing." "There was no music. I was
at the car. Right at the car," Mulligan told Reuters on
Friday.
Sergeant Kim Montes of the Florida Highway Patrol said on
Friday that "there was a portable DVD player in the
vehicle," but wouldn't elaborate further on it. She also
said there was no camera found, mounted on the dash or of
any kind, in the wreckage....
…Mulligan said he was driving in the same westbound direction as the truck before it attempted to make a left turn across the eastbound lanes of U.S. Highway 27 Alternate when he spotted the Tesla traveling east. Mulligan said the Tesla did not appear to be speeding on the road, which has a speed limit of 65 miles per hour, according to the FHP….” (2) .
- “…the vehicle was on a divided highway with Autopilot engaged when a tractor trailer drove across the highway perpendicular to the Model S. Neither Autopilot nor the driver noticed the white side of the tractor trailer against a brightly lit sky, so the brake was not applied. The high ride height of the trailer combined with its positioning across the road and the extremely rare circumstances of the impact caused the Model S to pass under the trailer, with the bottom of the trailer impacting the windshield of the Model S. Had the Model S impacted the front or rear of the trailer, even at high speed, its advanced crash safety system would likely have prevented serious injury as it has in numerous other similar incidents…” (3). Not sure how Tesla knows what Joshua Brown saw or did not see. Events prior to the crash unfolded over many seconds. Tesla must have precise data on the car’s speed and steering angle, video for those many seconds prior to the crash, as well as, what it was “seeing” from MobilEye’s cameras and radar data. At no time prior to the crash did it see anything crossing its intended travel lane? More important, why didn’t the truck driver see the Tesla? WHAT WAS HE DOING? What was the truck doing. How slow was it going? Hopefully there was a data speed recorder on the truck. Was the truck impounded, if so, how is the truck driver making a living since the crash?
One can also ask: Why was the truck not equipped with sensors that can warn the driver of collision risks at intersections? As I’ve written, driving is one of the most dangerous occupations. Why isn’t OSHA concerned about improving this workplace environment? Why doesn’t ATRI (the American Trucking Association’s research arm) recognize the lack availability/adoption of “SmartDrivingTruck technology” as one of its Critical Issues? Why didn’t the driver’s insurance agent encourage/convince him to equip his truck with collision risk sensors. If they aren’t commercially available, why hasn’t his insurance company invested/promoted/lobbied for their development? These low-volume rural highway intersections are very dangerous. Technology could help.
While the discussion is about AutoPilot, the Tesla also has Automated Emergency Braking (AEB) which is supposed to always be on. This seems more like an AEB failure rather than an AutoPilot failure. The Tesla didn’t just drive off the road, The discussion about “hands-on-wheels” is irrelevant. What was missing was “foot-on-brake” by the Tesla driver and “eyes-on-road” by, most importantly, the truck driver, since he initiated an action in violation to “rules of the road” that may have made a crash unavoidable.
-
“Problem Description: A fatal highway crash involving a 2015 Tesla Model S which, according to Tesla, was operating with automated driving systems (“Autopilot”) engaged, calls for an examination
of the design and performance of any driving aids in use at the time of the crash." [(4)](http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/acms/cs/jaxrs/download/doc/UCM530776/INOA-PE16007-7080.PDF). Not to be picky, but the initiator of the crash was the failure to yield by the truck driver. Why isn't this human failure the most fundamental "Problem Description"? If "driving aids" were supposed to "bail out" the truck driver's failure to yield, why isn't the AEB system's "design and performance" being examined. AutoPilot's responsibility is to keep the Tesla from steering off the road (and, as a last resort, yield to the AEB). The focus should be on AEBs. How many other Tesla drivers have perished that didn't have AutoPilot on, but had AEB? How many drivers have perished of other cars that have AEB? Seems as if this crash was more about an emergency automated systems failing to apply the brakes, rather than a driver not having his hands-on-wheel. Unfortunately, it is likely that we will eventually have a fatality in which an "AutoPilot" will fail to keep a "Tesla" on the road (or in a "correct" lane), but from what is known so far, this does not seem to be the crash. -
“What we learn here is that Mobileye’s system in Tesla’s Autopilot does gather the information from the vehicle’s sensors, primarily the front facing camera and radar, but while it gathers the data, Mobileye’s tech can’t (or not well enough until 2018) recognize the side of vehicles and therefore, itcan’t work in a situation where braking is required to stop a Tesla from hitting the side of another vehicle.
Since Tesla pushed its 7.1 update earlier this year, the automaker's own system used the same data to recognize anything, under adequate conditions, that could obstruct the path of the Tesla and if the radar's reading is consistent with the data from the camera, it will apply the brakes. Now that's something that was put to the test by Model S owners earlier in the week:" [(4)](http://electrek.co/2016/07/02/tesla-autopilot-mobileye-automatic-emergency-braking/). See video, "In the last two tests, the Autopilot appears to detect an obstacle as evidenced by the forward collision warning alerts, but the automatic emergency braking didn't activate, which raised questions – not unlike in the fatal crash. Though as Tesla explained, the trailer was not detected in the fatal crash, the radar confused it for an overhead sign, but in the tests above, the forward collision warning system sent out an alert – though as evidenced by the fact that the test subject wasn't hit, the AEB didn't need to activate and therefore it didn't. Tesla explains: "AEB does not engage when an alternative collision avoidance strategy (e.g., driver steering) remains viable. Instead, when a collision threat is detected, forward collision warning alerts the driver to encourage them to take appropriate evasive action. AEB is a fallback safety feature that operates by design only at high levels of severity and should not be tested with live subjects."..." [Read more](http://electrek.co/2016/07/02/tesla-autopilot-mobileye-automatic-emergency-braking/)(5) With all of the expertise that MobilEye has in image processing, it is surprising that it can't recognize the side of a tractor trailer or gets confused with overhead signs and tunnel openings. If overhead signs (and overpasses and tree canopies) are really the issue, then these can be readily geocoded and included in the digital map database.)
5. It seems that all of the other stuff about DVD player, watching movies, previous postings on YouTube is noise. Automated Collision Avoidance Systems and their Automated Emergency Braking sub-system MUST be more robust a mitigating “failed to yield right-of-way” situations irrespective of the “failure to yield” derived from a human action (as seems to have occurred in this crash) or an “autoPilot” (which doesn’t seem to be the case in this crash). Alain
(1) Self-Driving Tesla Was Involved in Fatal Crash, U.S. Says, June 30 NYT,
(2) DVD player found in Tesla car in fatal May crash, July 1, Reuters
(3)A Tragic Loss, June 30, Tesla Blog
(4) NHTSA ODI Resume PE 16-007 Automatic vehicle control system, June 28, 2016
(5) Tesla elaborates on Autopilot’s automatic emergency braking capacity over Mobileye’s system Electrek, July 2, 2016 See also: Understanding the fatal Tesla accident on Autopilot and the NHTSA probeJuly 2, 2016, Tesla Autopilot partner Mobileye comments on fatal crash, says tech isn’t meant to avoid this type of accident [Updated], July 1,
Who Will Build the Next Great Car Company?
E. Griffith, June 24, “…Also, he’s hit the decoy plenty of times. In 2012 he even did it in front of Ford’s board of directors. Back then the idea of self-driving cars looked, to Ford’s leadership, like a frivolous Silicon Valley moonshot. Four years later things have dramatically changed. Today Ford’s vehicle lineup features more than 30 options for semiautonomous features, including the automatic brakes I tested, and the company is aggressively working on cars that fully drive themselves. By year-end the company expects to have the largest fleet of autonomous test vehicles of any automaker.
Ford is not alone. The entire automotive industry is in the
midst of a radical transformation that is reshaping the very
definition of what it means to be a car company. There is hype,
hope, fear, and insecurity—and at the center of it all is the
self-driving car. Thanks to cheap sensors, powerful
machine-learning technology, and a kick in the butt from the
likes of Google and Tesla Motors , driverless vehicles are
becoming a sooner-than-you-think reality...." [Read more](http://fortune.com/self-driving-cars-silicon-valley-detroit/) Hmmm...A very good summary
of where the industry stands with respect to Self-driving;
however, it really doesn't address Driverless,
(autonomousTaxi (aTaxi) shared-ride on-demand transit). It
makes no mention of the low-speed [Easy Mile](http://easymile.com/), [2GetThere](http://www.2getthere.eu/), [CityMobil2](http://www.citymobil2.eu/en/)approaches.
Fortune is still seeing a personal car future and not a
Mobility-on-Demand future. That would be way too
disruptive. See also the [intro video](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=video&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjOgvOwqMjNAhWD7D4KHaKBBboQtwIIJTAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffortune.com%2Fself-driving-cars-silicon-valley-detroit%2F&usg=AFQjCNEAKqTgIv3IkKMPgmuTWrldf5Wn0w&sig2=K7e6Mhjn1jDEYqvjwMklZw&bvm=bv.125596728,d.cWw) Alain
Derailment of Amtrak passenger train 188, Philadelphia, PA, May 12, 2015 NTSB/ DCA15MR010
Public meeting of May 17 “… Executive Summary…This report addresses the following safety issues:
-
Crewmember situational awareness and management of multiple tasks….
-
Positive train control. In the accident area, positive train control had not yet been implemented at the time of the accident, but it has since been implemented. The NTSB found that the accident could have been avoided if positive train control or another control system had been in place to enforce the permanent speed restriction of 50 mph at the Franklin Junction curve.
Hmmm… Kudos to NTSB for finding “…the accident could have been avoided if positive train control or another control system had been in place to enforce…”
HOWEVER, given that PCT was [mandated by Congress in 2008](https://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/Details/L03588) with a deadline of December
15, 2015 and that 6 months before the deadline PTC had
NOT been implemented on Amtrak's highest volume segment
(PHL-NYC) is so unacceptable that this deserved to have
been their #1 bullet. NOT some poor train engineer that
was simply trying to do a job made enormously more
dangerous and stressful because Amtrak management failed
to implement in a timely manner what had been mandated
by its "sugar daddy"!! So the NTSB "threw" the engineer
"under the bus" and essentially all of the news reports
pointed to the engineer rather than Amtrak's senior
(mis)management ([The Atlantic](http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2016/02/the-mystery-of-amtrak-188/458967/), [NBC](http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Deadly-Amtrak-Crash-Philadelphia-NTSB-Cause-379762581.html),
[Washington Post](https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/ntsb-prepared-to-release-report-on-last-years-deadly-amtrak-wreck/2016/02/01/3c9f7e46-c837-11e5-88ff-e2d1b4289c2f_story.html), [WSJ](http://www.wsj.com/articles/ntsb-says-engineer-in-2015-philadelphia-amtrak-crash-lost-situational-awareness-1463497474),
[NYT](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/31/magazine/the-wreck-of-amtrak-188.html?_r=0)
etc. Why didn't the NYT do a long story on why Amtrak
management didn't install PTC in a timely manner???)
My point here is larger in that this same issue exists
in the rest of the transit industry where
crash-avoidance technology exists today that can
substantially reduce collisions and do so while printing
money for the transit industry. [Dr. Jerome Lutin and I](http://orfe.princeton.edu/%7Ealaink/SmartDrivingCars/PDFs/LutinKornhauser_2016TRB_BusACAS.pdf) have pointed out to deaf ears
that automated collision avoidance systems exist today
for buses whose costs are substantially less than the
net present value of the liability that these buses can
be expected to impose on society. This is about the cash
that a hopelessly bankrupt transit industry has to pay
out because it isn't installing existing crash avoidance
technology that is available today. On top of that cash
are all of the societal benefits associated with
eliminating collisions. There is no rush (not even a
faint heart-beat) by the industry to do this. FTA is
totally asleep, yet bus drivers continue to be placed in
some of the most stressful and unsafe working conditions
without the help that such technologies can deliver. I
can't be more blunt... The major cause of accidents in
the transit industry is the fact that the management of
the transit industry is not installing in its fleets
existing and available automated collision avoidance
systems. What is even more derelict is that new bus
procurement don't include such provisions either. When
is the finger going to finally be pointed towards
"Management" and the FTA instead of the poor bus driver
or train engineer? NTSB is getting close by at least
putting it 2nd, but if the public is to become aware,
it will need to rise to the top bullet. Alain
Extracting Cognition out of Images for the Purpose of Autonomous Driving
Chenyi Chen PhD Dissertation , “…the key part of the thesis, a direct perception approach is proposed to drive a car in a highway environment. In this approach, an input image is mapped to a small number of key perception indicators that directly relate to the affordance of a road/traffic state for driving…..” Read more Hmmm..FPO 10:00am, May 16 , 120 Sherrerd Hall, Establishing a foundation for image-based autonomous driving using DeepLearning Neural Networks trained in virtual environments. Very promising. Alain
###
N.J. superintendent killed while jogging was struck by student late for trip
K. Shea, April 19, “…The Robbinsville High School student who was driving the car that struck and killed the district’s superintendent Tuesday morning was late for a school trip when the crash occurred, according to two sources involved in the investigation….” Read more Hmmm…Most tragic in so many dimensions!!! HOWEVER, it was NOT the student that STRUCK the Superintendent, it was the CAR. AND the CAR needs to start being held responsible for ALLOWING such tragedies to ruin so many lives. It is very likely that this tragedy could have been averted had the car been equipped with an automated collision avoidance system and/or lane-keeping system. Given the availability of these “tragedy avoidance systems”, we should all be asking why this CAR wasn’t equipped with such a system and why all cars aren’t so equipped. Certainly innocent runners and dogs need to be asking such questions. So too, that young lady’s car insurance company; it must be muttering: “shouda bought her that upgrade”. What about the car companies themselves who are largely just sitting on the technology or the dealerships that don’t feel compelled to espouse the benefits of such technology while pushing more “horsepower” and “Corinthian Leather” (and worse yet: “AooleCarXYZ” that distracts drivers). We all know that Washington is broken. Them staying out of the way is probably best (although aggressively applying better human-visible paint/laneMarkings and human-readable signs would go a long way to helping both attentive drivers and automated lane-keeping systems). Everyone else has fundamental self-interest at stake and each needs to stop pointing the finger to the frail human driver. We have the technology and the the self-interest to make mobility substantially safer. Let’s really get on with it. It’s time! Alain
Hearing focus of SF 2569 Autonomous vehicles task force establishment and demonstration project for people with disabilities
March 23 Hmmm… Watch the video of the Committee Meeting. The testimony is Excellent and very compelling! Also see Self-Driving Minnesota Alain
U.S. DOT and IIHS announce historic commitment of 20 automakers to make automatic emergency braking standard on new vehicles
Press Release, Mar 17, NHTSA & IIHS “announced today a historic commitment by 20 automakers representing more than 99 percent of the U.S. auto market to make automatic emergency braking a standard feature on virtually all new cars no later than NHTSA’s 2022 reporting year, which begins Sept 1, 2022. Automakers making the commitment are Audi, BMW, FCA US LLC, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Kia, Maserati, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi Motors, Nissan, Porsche, Subaru, Tesla Motors Inc., Toyota, Volkswagen and Volvo Car USA. The unprecedented commitment means that this important safety technology will be available to more consumers more quickly than would be possible through the regulatory process…The commitment takes into account the evolution of AEB technology. It requires a level of functionality that is in line with research and crash data demonstrating that such systems are substantially reducing crashes, but does not stand in the way of improved capabilities that are just beginning to emerge. The performance measures are based on real world data showing that vehicles with this level of capability are avoiding crashes..Watch NHTSA video on AEB Download AEB video from IIHSRead more Hmmmm…Fantastic! Automakers leading with regulatory process staying out of the way. Alain
Motor Vehicle Deaths Increase by Largest Percent in 50 Years
Press Release Feb 16 “With continued lower gasoline prices and an improving economy resulting in an estimated 3.5% increase in motor-vehicle mileage, the number of motor-vehicle deaths in 2015 totaled 38,300, up 8% from 2014.
The 2015 estimate is provisional and may be revised when
more data are available. The total for 2015 was up 8% from
the 2013 figure. The annual total for 2014 was 35,398, a
less than 0.5% increase from 2013. The 2013 figure was 3%
lower than 2012. The estimated annual population death rate
is 11.87 deaths per 100,000 population, an increase of 7%
from the 2014 rate. The estimated annual mileage death rate
is 1.22 deaths per 100 million vehicle miles traveled, an
increase of 5% from the 2014 rate. [Read more](http://www.nsc.org/NewsDocuments/2016/mv-fatality-report-1215.pdf)Hmmmm...This is REALLY
BAD news. Come on insurance. This is costing you
money! Accident rates going up means that your
actuarials are behind, your regulated pricing lags and
you are losing money. To get ahead of your actuarials,
you MUST incentivize the adoption of automated collision
avoidance systems. You'll then do very well, thank you
AND help society. Alain
###
Obama’s $4 Billion Plan for Self-Driving Cars Will Make Google Very Happy
M. Bergen, Jan 14 “The Obama Administration has seen the self-driving future, and it’s jumping aboard. At the Detroit auto show on Thursday morning, U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx will unveil a plan to develop a national blueprint for autonomous driving technology within the next six months. He will also announce that President Obama is planning to insert $4 billion into the 2017 budget for a 10-year plan to support and “accelerate” vehicle automation projects.
"We are on the cusp of a new era in automotive technology
with enormous potential to save lives, reduce greenhouse gas
emissions, and transform mobility for the American people,"
Secretary Foxx said in a statement. ...But here's the part of Foxx's talk
that really matters for Google: These national rules will
allow fully driverless cars..." [Read More](http://recode.net/2016/01/14/obamas-4-billion-plan-for-self-driving-cars-will-make-google-very-happy/) Hmmm... A [few months ago](http://www.its.dot.gov/press/2015/ngv_tech_announcement.htm) it was $42M for Connected Vehicles.
Today it is 100x for automated vehicles! Finally
Secretary Foxx.."[YES! YES! JESUS H. TAP-DANCING CHRIST... I HAVE SEEN THE LIGHT](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX5tfRdkoY0)" (Blue Brothers)
Yea!!!!! :-) Alain
Google Pairs With Ford To Build Self-Driving Cars
J. Hyde & S. Carty, Dec. 21 “Google and Ford will create a joint venture to build self-driving vehicles with Google’s technology, a huge step by both companies toward a new business of automated ride sharing, …According to three sources familiar with the plans, the partnership is set to be announced by Ford at the Consumer Electronics Show in January. By pairing with Google, Ford gets a massive boost in self-driving software development; while the automaker has been experimenting with its own systems for years, it only revealed plans this month to begin testing on public streets in California….
Google already has several links to Ford; the head of the
self-driving car project, John Krafcik, worked for 14 years
at Ford, including a stint as head of truck engineering, and
several other ex-Ford employees work in the unit as well.
Former Ford chief executive Alan Mulally joined Google's
board last year.
And Ford executives have been clear for years that the
company was ready to embrace a future where cars were sold
as on-demand services. Ford CEO Mark Fields has repeatedly
said Ford was thinking of itself "as a mobility company,"
and what that would mean for its business" [Read more](https://www.yahoo.com/autos/google-pairs-with-ford-to-1326344237400118.html) Hmmm...Not surprising and
not exclusive. :-) Alain
Adam Jonas’ View on Autonomous Cars
Video similar to part of Adam’s Luncheon talk @ 2015 Florida Automated Vehicle Symposium on Dec 1. Hmmm … Watch Video especially at the 13:12 mark. Compelling; especially after the 60 Minutes segment above! Also see his TipRanks. Alain
This list is maintained by Alain Kornhauser and hosted by the Princeton University LISTSERV.
This list is maintained by Alain Kornhauser and hosted by the Princeton University LISTSERV.
This list is maintained by Alain Kornhauser and hosted by the Princeton University LISTSERV.